 Requirements Management with Semantic Technology: An Empirical Study on Automated Requirements Categorization and Conflict Analysis |
| Requirements Management with Semantic Technology: An Empirical Study on Automated Requirements Categorization and Conflict Analysis |
| Requirements Management with Semantic Technology: An Empirical Study on Automated Requirements Categorization and Conflict Analysis |
| Requirements Management with Semantic Technology: An Empirical Study on Automated Requirements Categorization and Conflict Analysis |
| Requirements Management with Semantic Technology: An Empirical Study on Automated Requirements Categorization and Conflict Analysis |
| Requirements Management with Semantic Technology: An Empirical Study on Automated Requirements Categorization and Conflict Analysis |
| Requirements Management with Semantic Technology: An Empirical Study on Automated Requirements Categorization and Conflict Analysis |
| Requirements Management with Semantic Technology: An Empirical Study on Automated Requirements Categorization and Conflict Analysis |
| Requirements Management with Semantic Technology: An Empirical Study on Automated Requirements Categorization and Conflict Analysis |
| Requirements Management with Semantic Technology: An Empirical Study on Automated Requirements Categorization and Conflict Analysis |
| Requirements Management with Semantic Technology: An Empirical Study on Automated Requirements Categorization and Conflict Analysis |
| Requirements Management with Semantic Technology: An Empirical Study on Automated Requirements Categorization and Conflict Analysis |
| Requirements Management with Semantic Technology: An Empirical Study on Automated Requirements Categorization and Conflict Analysis |
| Requirements Management with Semantic Technology: An Empirical Study on Automated Requirements Categorization and Conflict Analysis |
| Requirements Management with Semantic Technology: An Empirical Study on Automated Requirements Categorization and Conflict Analysis |
| SC: Using Service Discovery to Support Requirements Elicitation in the ERP Domain |
| SC: Using Service Discovery to Support Requirements Elicitation in the ERP Domain |
| SC: Using Service Discovery to Support Requirements Elicitation in the ERP Domain |
| SC: Using Service Discovery to Support Requirements Elicitation in the ERP Domain |
| SC: Using Service Discovery to Support Requirements Elicitation in the ERP Domain |
| SC: Using Service Discovery to Support Requirements Elicitation in the ERP Domain |
| SC: Using Service Discovery to Support Requirements Elicitation in the ERP Domain |
| SC: Using Service Discovery to Support Requirements Elicitation in the ERP Domain |
| SC: Using Service Discovery to Support Requirements Elicitation in the ERP Domain |
| SC: Using Service Discovery to Support Requirements Elicitation in the ERP Domain |
| SC: Using Service Discovery to Support Requirements Elicitation in the ERP Domain |
| SC: Using Service Discovery to Support Requirements Elicitation in the ERP Domain |
| SC: Using Service Discovery to Support Requirements Elicitation in the ERP Domain |
| SC: Using Service Discovery to Support Requirements Elicitation in the ERP Domain |
| SC: Using Service Discovery to Support Requirements Elicitation in the ERP Domain |
| Requirements Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems: Core Ontology and Problem Statement |
| Requirements Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems: Core Ontology and Problem Statement |
| Requirements Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems: Core Ontology and Problem Statement |
| Requirements Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems: Core Ontology and Problem Statement |
| Requirements Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems: Core Ontology and Problem Statement |
| Requirements Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems: Core Ontology and Problem Statement |
| Requirements Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems: Core Ontology and Problem Statement |
| Requirements Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems: Core Ontology and Problem Statement |
| Requirements Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems: Core Ontology and Problem Statement |
| Requirements Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems: Core Ontology and Problem Statement |
| Requirements Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems: Core Ontology and Problem Statement |
| Requirements Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems: Core Ontology and Problem Statement |
| Requirements Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems: Core Ontology and Problem Statement |
| Requirements Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems: Core Ontology and Problem Statement |
| Requirements Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems: Core Ontology and Problem Statement |
| A Fuzzy Service Adaptation Based on QoS Satisfaction |
| A Fuzzy Service Adaptation Based on QoS Satisfaction |
| A Fuzzy Service Adaptation Based on QoS Satisfaction |
| A Fuzzy Service Adaptation Based on QoS Satisfaction |
| A Fuzzy Service Adaptation Based on QoS Satisfaction |
| A Fuzzy Service Adaptation Based on QoS Satisfaction |
| A Fuzzy Service Adaptation Based on QoS Satisfaction |
| A Fuzzy Service Adaptation Based on QoS Satisfaction |
| A Fuzzy Service Adaptation Based on QoS Satisfaction |
| A Fuzzy Service Adaptation Based on QoS Satisfaction |
| A Fuzzy Service Adaptation Based on QoS Satisfaction |
| A Fuzzy Service Adaptation Based on QoS Satisfaction |
| A Fuzzy Service Adaptation Based on QoS Satisfaction |
| A Fuzzy Service Adaptation Based on QoS Satisfaction |
| Dealing with Known Unknowns: Towards a Game-Theoretic Foundation for Software Requirement Evolution |
| Dealing with Known Unknowns: Towards a Game-Theoretic Foundation for Software Requirement Evolution |
| Dealing with Known Unknowns: Towards a Game-Theoretic Foundation for Software Requirement Evolution |
| Dealing with Known Unknowns: Towards a Game-Theoretic Foundation for Software Requirement Evolution |
| Dealing with Known Unknowns: Towards a Game-Theoretic Foundation for Software Requirement Evolution |
| Dealing with Known Unknowns: Towards a Game-Theoretic Foundation for Software Requirement Evolution |
| Dealing with Known Unknowns: Towards a Game-Theoretic Foundation for Software Requirement Evolution |
| Dealing with Known Unknowns: Towards a Game-Theoretic Foundation for Software Requirement Evolution |
| Dealing with Known Unknowns: Towards a Game-Theoretic Foundation for Software Requirement Evolution |
| Dealing with Known Unknowns: Towards a Game-Theoretic Foundation for Software Requirement Evolution |
| Dealing with Known Unknowns: Towards a Game-Theoretic Foundation for Software Requirement Evolution |
| Dealing with Known Unknowns: Towards a Game-Theoretic Foundation for Software Requirement Evolution |
| Dealing with Known Unknowns: Towards a Game-Theoretic Foundation for Software Requirement Evolution |
| Dealing with Known Unknowns: Towards a Game-Theoretic Foundation for Software Requirement Evolution |
| Dealing with Known Unknowns: Towards a Game-Theoretic Foundation for Software Requirement Evolution |
| Goal-Based Behavioral Customization of Information Systems |
| Goal-Based Behavioral Customization of Information Systems |
| Goal-Based Behavioral Customization of Information Systems |
| Goal-Based Behavioral Customization of Information Systems |
| Goal-Based Behavioral Customization of Information Systems |
| Goal-Based Behavioral Customization of Information Systems |
| Goal-Based Behavioral Customization of Information Systems |
| Goal-Based Behavioral Customization of Information Systems |
| Goal-Based Behavioral Customization of Information Systems |
| Goal-Based Behavioral Customization of Information Systems |
| Goal-Based Behavioral Customization of Information Systems |
| Goal-Based Behavioral Customization of Information Systems |
| Goal-Based Behavioral Customization of Information Systems |
| Goal-Based Behavioral Customization of Information Systems |
| Goal-Based Behavioral Customization of Information Systems |
| Goal-Based Behavioral Customization of Information Systems |
| From Requirements to Models: Feedback Generation as a Result of Formalization |
| From Requirements to Models: Feedback Generation as a Result of Formalization |
| From Requirements to Models: Feedback Generation as a Result of Formalization |
| From Requirements to Models: Feedback Generation as a Result of Formalization |
| From Requirements to Models: Feedback Generation as a Result of Formalization |
| From Requirements to Models: Feedback Generation as a Result of Formalization |
| From Requirements to Models: Feedback Generation as a Result of Formalization |
| From Requirements to Models: Feedback Generation as a Result of Formalization |
| From Requirements to Models: Feedback Generation as a Result of Formalization |
| From Requirements to Models: Feedback Generation as a Result of Formalization |
| From Requirements to Models: Feedback Generation as a Result of Formalization |
| From Requirements to Models: Feedback Generation as a Result of Formalization |
| From Requirements to Models: Feedback Generation as a Result of Formalization |
| From Requirements to Models: Feedback Generation as a Result of Formalization |
| From Requirements to Models: Feedback Generation as a Result of Formalization |
| A Web Usability Evaluation Process for Model-Driven Web Development |
| A Web Usability Evaluation Process for Model-Driven Web Development |
| A Web Usability Evaluation Process for Model-Driven Web Development |
| A Web Usability Evaluation Process for Model-Driven Web Development |
| A Web Usability Evaluation Process for Model-Driven Web Development |
| A Web Usability Evaluation Process for Model-Driven Web Development |
| A Web Usability Evaluation Process for Model-Driven Web Development |
| A Web Usability Evaluation Process for Model-Driven Web Development |
| A Web Usability Evaluation Process for Model-Driven Web Development |
| A Web Usability Evaluation Process for Model-Driven Web Development |
| A Web Usability Evaluation Process for Model-Driven Web Development |
| A Web Usability Evaluation Process for Model-Driven Web Development |
| A Web Usability Evaluation Process for Model-Driven Web Development |
| A Web Usability Evaluation Process for Model-Driven Web Development |
| A Web Usability Evaluation Process for Model-Driven Web Development |
| A Trace Metamodel Proposal Based on the Model Driven Architecture Framework for the Traceability of User Requirements in Data Warehouses |
| A Trace Metamodel Proposal Based on the Model Driven Architecture Framework for the Traceability of User Requirements in Data Warehouses |
| A Trace Metamodel Proposal Based on the Model Driven Architecture Framework for the Traceability of User Requirements in Data Warehouses |
| A Trace Metamodel Proposal Based on the Model Driven Architecture Framework for the Traceability of User Requirements in Data Warehouses |
| A Trace Metamodel Proposal Based on the Model Driven Architecture Framework for the Traceability of User Requirements in Data Warehouses |
| A Trace Metamodel Proposal Based on the Model Driven Architecture Framework for the Traceability of User Requirements in Data Warehouses |
| A Trace Metamodel Proposal Based on the Model Driven Architecture Framework for the Traceability of User Requirements in Data Warehouses |
| A Trace Metamodel Proposal Based on the Model Driven Architecture Framework for the Traceability of User Requirements in Data Warehouses |
| A Trace Metamodel Proposal Based on the Model Driven Architecture Framework for the Traceability of User Requirements in Data Warehouses |
| A Trace Metamodel Proposal Based on the Model Driven Architecture Framework for the Traceability of User Requirements in Data Warehouses |
| A Trace Metamodel Proposal Based on the Model Driven Architecture Framework for the Traceability of User Requirements in Data Warehouses |
| A Trace Metamodel Proposal Based on the Model Driven Architecture Framework for the Traceability of User Requirements in Data Warehouses |
| A Trace Metamodel Proposal Based on the Model Driven Architecture Framework for the Traceability of User Requirements in Data Warehouses |
| A Trace Metamodel Proposal Based on the Model Driven Architecture Framework for the Traceability of User Requirements in Data Warehouses |
| A Trace Metamodel Proposal Based on the Model Driven Architecture Framework for the Traceability of User Requirements in Data Warehouses |
| Ontological Foundations for Conceptual Part-Whole Relations: The Case of Collectives and Their Parts |
| Ontological Foundations for Conceptual Part-Whole Relations: The Case of Collectives and Their Parts |
| Ontological Foundations for Conceptual Part-Whole Relations: The Case of Collectives and Their Parts |
| Ontological Foundations for Conceptual Part-Whole Relations: The Case of Collectives and Their Parts |
| Ontological Foundations for Conceptual Part-Whole Relations: The Case of Collectives and Their Parts |
| Ontological Foundations for Conceptual Part-Whole Relations: The Case of Collectives and Their Parts |
| Ontological Foundations for Conceptual Part-Whole Relations: The Case of Collectives and Their Parts |
| Ontological Foundations for Conceptual Part-Whole Relations: The Case of Collectives and Their Parts |
| Ontological Foundations for Conceptual Part-Whole Relations: The Case of Collectives and Their Parts |
| Ontological Foundations for Conceptual Part-Whole Relations: The Case of Collectives and Their Parts |
| Ontological Foundations for Conceptual Part-Whole Relations: The Case of Collectives and Their Parts |
| Ontological Foundations for Conceptual Part-Whole Relations: The Case of Collectives and Their Parts |
| Ontological Foundations for Conceptual Part-Whole Relations: The Case of Collectives and Their Parts |
| Ontological Foundations for Conceptual Part-Whole Relations: The Case of Collectives and Their Parts |
| Ontological Foundations for Conceptual Part-Whole Relations: The Case of Collectives and Their Parts |
| Ontological Foundations for Conceptual Part-Whole Relations: The Case of Collectives and Their Parts |
| Product-Based Workflow Design for Monitoring of Collaborative Business Processes |
| Product-Based Workflow Design for Monitoring of Collaborative Business Processes |
| Product-Based Workflow Design for Monitoring of Collaborative Business Processes |
| Product-Based Workflow Design for Monitoring of Collaborative Business Processes |
| Product-Based Workflow Design for Monitoring of Collaborative Business Processes |
| Product-Based Workflow Design for Monitoring of Collaborative Business Processes |
| Product-Based Workflow Design for Monitoring of Collaborative Business Processes |
| Product-Based Workflow Design for Monitoring of Collaborative Business Processes |
| Product-Based Workflow Design for Monitoring of Collaborative Business Processes |
| Product-Based Workflow Design for Monitoring of Collaborative Business Processes |
| Product-Based Workflow Design for Monitoring of Collaborative Business Processes |
| Product-Based Workflow Design for Monitoring of Collaborative Business Processes |
| Product-Based Workflow Design for Monitoring of Collaborative Business Processes |
| Product-Based Workflow Design for Monitoring of Collaborative Business Processes |
| Product-Based Workflow Design for Monitoring of Collaborative Business Processes |
| Modeling Design Patterns with Description Logics: A Case Study |
| Modeling Design Patterns with Description Logics: A Case Study |
| Modeling Design Patterns with Description Logics: A Case Study |
| Modeling Design Patterns with Description Logics: A Case Study |
| Modeling Design Patterns with Description Logics: A Case Study |
| Modeling Design Patterns with Description Logics: A Case Study |
| Modeling Design Patterns with Description Logics: A Case Study |
| Modeling Design Patterns with Description Logics: A Case Study |
| Modeling Design Patterns with Description Logics: A Case Study |
| Modeling Design Patterns with Description Logics: A Case Study |
| Modeling Design Patterns with Description Logics: A Case Study |
| Modeling Design Patterns with Description Logics: A Case Study |
| Modeling Design Patterns with Description Logics: A Case Study |
| Modeling Design Patterns with Description Logics: A Case Study |
| Modeling Design Patterns with Description Logics: A Case Study |
| Interactively Eliciting Database Constraints and Dependencies |
| Interactively Eliciting Database Constraints and Dependencies |
| Interactively Eliciting Database Constraints and Dependencies |
| Interactively Eliciting Database Constraints and Dependencies |
| Interactively Eliciting Database Constraints and Dependencies |
| Interactively Eliciting Database Constraints and Dependencies |
| Interactively Eliciting Database Constraints and Dependencies |
| Interactively Eliciting Database Constraints and Dependencies |
| Interactively Eliciting Database Constraints and Dependencies |
| Interactively Eliciting Database Constraints and Dependencies |
| Interactively Eliciting Database Constraints and Dependencies |
| Interactively Eliciting Database Constraints and Dependencies |
| Interactively Eliciting Database Constraints and Dependencies |
| Interactively Eliciting Database Constraints and Dependencies |
| Interactively Eliciting Database Constraints and Dependencies |
| A Conceptual Model for Integrated Governance, Risk and Compliance |
| A Conceptual Model for Integrated Governance, Risk and Compliance |
| A Conceptual Model for Integrated Governance, Risk and Compliance |
| A Conceptual Model for Integrated Governance, Risk and Compliance |
| A Conceptual Model for Integrated Governance, Risk and Compliance |
| A Conceptual Model for Integrated Governance, Risk and Compliance |
| A Conceptual Model for Integrated Governance, Risk and Compliance |
| A Conceptual Model for Integrated Governance, Risk and Compliance |
| A Conceptual Model for Integrated Governance, Risk and Compliance |
| A Conceptual Model for Integrated Governance, Risk and Compliance |
| A Conceptual Model for Integrated Governance, Risk and Compliance |
| A Conceptual Model for Integrated Governance, Risk and Compliance |
| A Conceptual Model for Integrated Governance, Risk and Compliance |
| A Conceptual Model for Integrated Governance, Risk and Compliance |
| A Conceptual Model for Integrated Governance, Risk and Compliance |
| Using Synchronised Tag Clouds for Browsing Data Collections |
| Using Synchronised Tag Clouds for Browsing Data Collections |
| Using Synchronised Tag Clouds for Browsing Data Collections |
| Using Synchronised Tag Clouds for Browsing Data Collections |
| Using Synchronised Tag Clouds for Browsing Data Collections |
| Using Synchronised Tag Clouds for Browsing Data Collections |
| Using Synchronised Tag Clouds for Browsing Data Collections |
| Using Synchronised Tag Clouds for Browsing Data Collections |
| Using Synchronised Tag Clouds for Browsing Data Collections |
| Using Synchronised Tag Clouds for Browsing Data Collections |
| Using Synchronised Tag Clouds for Browsing Data Collections |
| Using Synchronised Tag Clouds for Browsing Data Collections |
| Using Synchronised Tag Clouds for Browsing Data Collections |
| Using Synchronised Tag Clouds for Browsing Data Collections |
| Using Synchronised Tag Clouds for Browsing Data Collections |
| Revisiting Naur’s Programming as Theory Building for Enterprise Architecture Modelling |
| Revisiting Naur’s Programming as Theory Building for Enterprise Architecture Modelling |
| Revisiting Naur’s Programming as Theory Building for Enterprise Architecture Modelling |
| Revisiting Naur’s Programming as Theory Building for Enterprise Architecture Modelling |
| Revisiting Naur’s Programming as Theory Building for Enterprise Architecture Modelling |
| Revisiting Naur’s Programming as Theory Building for Enterprise Architecture Modelling |
| Revisiting Naur’s Programming as Theory Building for Enterprise Architecture Modelling |
| Revisiting Naur’s Programming as Theory Building for Enterprise Architecture Modelling |
| A DSL for Corporate Wiki Initialization |
| A DSL for Corporate Wiki Initialization |
| A DSL for Corporate Wiki Initialization |
| A DSL for Corporate Wiki Initialization |
| A DSL for Corporate Wiki Initialization |
| A DSL for Corporate Wiki Initialization |
| A DSL for Corporate Wiki Initialization |
| A DSL for Corporate Wiki Initialization |
| A DSL for Corporate Wiki Initialization |
| A DSL for Corporate Wiki Initialization |
| A DSL for Corporate Wiki Initialization |
| A DSL for Corporate Wiki Initialization |
| A DSL for Corporate Wiki Initialization |
| A DSL for Corporate Wiki Initialization |
| A DSL for Corporate Wiki Initialization |
| The REA-DSL: A Domain Specific Modeling Language for Business Models |
| The REA-DSL: A Domain Specific Modeling Language for Business Models |
| The REA-DSL: A Domain Specific Modeling Language for Business Models |
| The REA-DSL: A Domain Specific Modeling Language for Business Models |
| The REA-DSL: A Domain Specific Modeling Language for Business Models |
| The REA-DSL: A Domain Specific Modeling Language for Business Models |
| The REA-DSL: A Domain Specific Modeling Language for Business Models |
| The REA-DSL: A Domain Specific Modeling Language for Business Models |
| The REA-DSL: A Domain Specific Modeling Language for Business Models |
| The REA-DSL: A Domain Specific Modeling Language for Business Models |
| The REA-DSL: A Domain Specific Modeling Language for Business Models |
| The REA-DSL: A Domain Specific Modeling Language for Business Models |
| The REA-DSL: A Domain Specific Modeling Language for Business Models |
| The REA-DSL: A Domain Specific Modeling Language for Business Models |
| The REA-DSL: A Domain Specific Modeling Language for Business Models |
| A Foundational Approach for Managing Process Variability |
| A Foundational Approach for Managing Process Variability |
| A Foundational Approach for Managing Process Variability |
| A Foundational Approach for Managing Process Variability |
| A Foundational Approach for Managing Process Variability |
| A Foundational Approach for Managing Process Variability |
| A Foundational Approach for Managing Process Variability |
| A Foundational Approach for Managing Process Variability |
| A Foundational Approach for Managing Process Variability |
| A Foundational Approach for Managing Process Variability |
| A Foundational Approach for Managing Process Variability |
| A Foundational Approach for Managing Process Variability |
| A Foundational Approach for Managing Process Variability |
| A Foundational Approach for Managing Process Variability |
| A Foundational Approach for Managing Process Variability |
| A Foundational Approach for Managing Process Variability |
| Tangible Media in Process Modeling – A Controlled Experiment |
| Tangible Media in Process Modeling – A Controlled Experiment |
| Tangible Media in Process Modeling – A Controlled Experiment |
| Tangible Media in Process Modeling – A Controlled Experiment |
| Tangible Media in Process Modeling – A Controlled Experiment |
| Tangible Media in Process Modeling – A Controlled Experiment |
| Tangible Media in Process Modeling – A Controlled Experiment |
| Tangible Media in Process Modeling – A Controlled Experiment |
| Tangible Media in Process Modeling – A Controlled Experiment |
| Tangible Media in Process Modeling – A Controlled Experiment |
| Tangible Media in Process Modeling – A Controlled Experiment |
| Tangible Media in Process Modeling – A Controlled Experiment |
| Tangible Media in Process Modeling – A Controlled Experiment |
| Tangible Media in Process Modeling – A Controlled Experiment |
| Tangible Media in Process Modeling – A Controlled Experiment |
| Tangible Media in Process Modeling – A Controlled Experiment |
| Experiences of Using Different Communication Styles in Business Process Support Systems with the Shared Spaces Architecture |
| Experiences of Using Different Communication Styles in Business Process Support Systems with the Shared Spaces Architecture |
| Experiences of Using Different Communication Styles in Business Process Support Systems with the Shared Spaces Architecture |
| Experiences of Using Different Communication Styles in Business Process Support Systems with the Shared Spaces Architecture |
| Experiences of Using Different Communication Styles in Business Process Support Systems with the Shared Spaces Architecture |
| Experiences of Using Different Communication Styles in Business Process Support Systems with the Shared Spaces Architecture |
| Experiences of Using Different Communication Styles in Business Process Support Systems with the Shared Spaces Architecture |
| Experiences of Using Different Communication Styles in Business Process Support Systems with the Shared Spaces Architecture |
| Experiences of Using Different Communication Styles in Business Process Support Systems with the Shared Spaces Architecture |
| Experiences of Using Different Communication Styles in Business Process Support Systems with the Shared Spaces Architecture |
| Experiences of Using Different Communication Styles in Business Process Support Systems with the Shared Spaces Architecture |
| Experiences of Using Different Communication Styles in Business Process Support Systems with the Shared Spaces Architecture |
| Experiences of Using Different Communication Styles in Business Process Support Systems with the Shared Spaces Architecture |
| Experiences of Using Different Communication Styles in Business Process Support Systems with the Shared Spaces Architecture |
| Experiences of Using Different Communication Styles in Business Process Support Systems with the Shared Spaces Architecture |
| What Methodology Attributes Are Critical for Potential Users? Understanding the Effect of Human Needs |
| What Methodology Attributes Are Critical for Potential Users? Understanding the Effect of Human Needs |
| What Methodology Attributes Are Critical for Potential Users? Understanding the Effect of Human Needs |
| What Methodology Attributes Are Critical for Potential Users? Understanding the Effect of Human Needs |
| What Methodology Attributes Are Critical for Potential Users? Understanding the Effect of Human Needs |
| What Methodology Attributes Are Critical for Potential Users? Understanding the Effect of Human Needs |
| What Methodology Attributes Are Critical for Potential Users? Understanding the Effect of Human Needs |
| What Methodology Attributes Are Critical for Potential Users? Understanding the Effect of Human Needs |
| What Methodology Attributes Are Critical for Potential Users? Understanding the Effect of Human Needs |
| What Methodology Attributes Are Critical for Potential Users? Understanding the Effect of Human Needs |
| What Methodology Attributes Are Critical for Potential Users? Understanding the Effect of Human Needs |
| What Methodology Attributes Are Critical for Potential Users? Understanding the Effect of Human Needs |
| What Methodology Attributes Are Critical for Potential Users? Understanding the Effect of Human Needs |
| What Methodology Attributes Are Critical for Potential Users? Understanding the Effect of Human Needs |
| What Methodology Attributes Are Critical for Potential Users? Understanding the Effect of Human Needs |
| Exploratory Case Study Research on SOA Investment Decision Processes in Austria |
| Exploratory Case Study Research on SOA Investment Decision Processes in Austria |
| Exploratory Case Study Research on SOA Investment Decision Processes in Austria |
| Exploratory Case Study Research on SOA Investment Decision Processes in Austria |
| Exploratory Case Study Research on SOA Investment Decision Processes in Austria |
| Exploratory Case Study Research on SOA Investment Decision Processes in Austria |
| Exploratory Case Study Research on SOA Investment Decision Processes in Austria |
| Exploratory Case Study Research on SOA Investment Decision Processes in Austria |
| A Metamodelling Approach for Model Translations |
| A Metamodelling Approach for Model Translations |
| A Metamodelling Approach for Model Translations |
| A Metamodelling Approach for Model Translations |
| A Metamodelling Approach for Model Translations |
| A Metamodelling Approach for Model Translations |
| A Metamodelling Approach for Model Translations |
| A Metamodelling Approach for Model Translations |
| A Metamodelling Approach for Model Translations |
| A Metamodelling Approach for Model Translations |
| A Metamodelling Approach for Model Translations |
| A Metamodelling Approach for Model Translations |
| A Metamodelling Approach for Model Translations |
| A Metamodelling Approach for Model Translations |
| A Metamodelling Approach for Model Translations |
| Automatic Generation of a Data-Centered View of Business Processes |
| Automatic Generation of a Data-Centered View of Business Processes |
| Automatic Generation of a Data-Centered View of Business Processes |
| Automatic Generation of a Data-Centered View of Business Processes |
| Automatic Generation of a Data-Centered View of Business Processes |
| Automatic Generation of a Data-Centered View of Business Processes |
| Automatic Generation of a Data-Centered View of Business Processes |
| Automatic Generation of a Data-Centered View of Business Processes |
| Automatic Generation of a Data-Centered View of Business Processes |
| Automatic Generation of a Data-Centered View of Business Processes |
| Automatic Generation of a Data-Centered View of Business Processes |
| Automatic Generation of a Data-Centered View of Business Processes |
| Automatic Generation of a Data-Centered View of Business Processes |
| Automatic Generation of a Data-Centered View of Business Processes |
| Automatic Generation of a Data-Centered View of Business Processes |
| Connecting Security Requirements Analysis and Secure Design Using Patterns and UMLsec |
| Connecting Security Requirements Analysis and Secure Design Using Patterns and UMLsec |
| Connecting Security Requirements Analysis and Secure Design Using Patterns and UMLsec |
| Connecting Security Requirements Analysis and Secure Design Using Patterns and UMLsec |
| Connecting Security Requirements Analysis and Secure Design Using Patterns and UMLsec |
| Connecting Security Requirements Analysis and Secure Design Using Patterns and UMLsec |
| Connecting Security Requirements Analysis and Secure Design Using Patterns and UMLsec |
| Connecting Security Requirements Analysis and Secure Design Using Patterns and UMLsec |
| Connecting Security Requirements Analysis and Secure Design Using Patterns and UMLsec |
| Connecting Security Requirements Analysis and Secure Design Using Patterns and UMLsec |
| Connecting Security Requirements Analysis and Secure Design Using Patterns and UMLsec |
| Connecting Security Requirements Analysis and Secure Design Using Patterns and UMLsec |
| Connecting Security Requirements Analysis and Secure Design Using Patterns and UMLsec |
| Connecting Security Requirements Analysis and Secure Design Using Patterns and UMLsec |
| Connecting Security Requirements Analysis and Secure Design Using Patterns and UMLsec |
| Connecting Security Requirements Analysis and Secure Design Using Patterns and UMLsec |
| Transforming Enterprise Architecture Models: An Artificial Ontology View |
| Transforming Enterprise Architecture Models: An Artificial Ontology View |
| Transforming Enterprise Architecture Models: An Artificial Ontology View |
| Transforming Enterprise Architecture Models: An Artificial Ontology View |
| Transforming Enterprise Architecture Models: An Artificial Ontology View |
| Transforming Enterprise Architecture Models: An Artificial Ontology View |
| Transforming Enterprise Architecture Models: An Artificial Ontology View |
| Transforming Enterprise Architecture Models: An Artificial Ontology View |
| Handling Concept Drift in Process Mining |
| Handling Concept Drift in Process Mining |
| Handling Concept Drift in Process Mining |
| Handling Concept Drift in Process Mining |
| Handling Concept Drift in Process Mining |
| Handling Concept Drift in Process Mining |
| Handling Concept Drift in Process Mining |
| Handling Concept Drift in Process Mining |
| Handling Concept Drift in Process Mining |
| Handling Concept Drift in Process Mining |
| Handling Concept Drift in Process Mining |
| Handling Concept Drift in Process Mining |
| Handling Concept Drift in Process Mining |
| Handling Concept Drift in Process Mining |
| Handling Concept Drift in Process Mining |
| An Iterative Approach for Business Process Template Synthesis from Compliance Rules |
| An Iterative Approach for Business Process Template Synthesis from Compliance Rules |
| An Iterative Approach for Business Process Template Synthesis from Compliance Rules |
| An Iterative Approach for Business Process Template Synthesis from Compliance Rules |
| An Iterative Approach for Business Process Template Synthesis from Compliance Rules |
| An Iterative Approach for Business Process Template Synthesis from Compliance Rules |
| An Iterative Approach for Business Process Template Synthesis from Compliance Rules |
| An Iterative Approach for Business Process Template Synthesis from Compliance Rules |
| An Iterative Approach for Business Process Template Synthesis from Compliance Rules |
| An Iterative Approach for Business Process Template Synthesis from Compliance Rules |
| An Iterative Approach for Business Process Template Synthesis from Compliance Rules |
| An Iterative Approach for Business Process Template Synthesis from Compliance Rules |
| An Iterative Approach for Business Process Template Synthesis from Compliance Rules |
| An Iterative Approach for Business Process Template Synthesis from Compliance Rules |
| An Iterative Approach for Business Process Template Synthesis from Compliance Rules |
| An Iterative Approach for Business Process Template Synthesis from Compliance Rules |
| A Design of Business-Technology Alignment Consulting Framework |
| A Design of Business-Technology Alignment Consulting Framework |
| A Design of Business-Technology Alignment Consulting Framework |
| A Design of Business-Technology Alignment Consulting Framework |
| A Design of Business-Technology Alignment Consulting Framework |
| A Design of Business-Technology Alignment Consulting Framework |
| A Design of Business-Technology Alignment Consulting Framework |
| A Design of Business-Technology Alignment Consulting Framework |
| A Design of Business-Technology Alignment Consulting Framework |
| A Design of Business-Technology Alignment Consulting Framework |
| A Design of Business-Technology Alignment Consulting Framework |
| A Design of Business-Technology Alignment Consulting Framework |
| A Design of Business-Technology Alignment Consulting Framework |
| A Design of Business-Technology Alignment Consulting Framework |
| ONTECTAS: Bridging the Gap between Collaborative Tagging Systems and Structured Data |
| ONTECTAS: Bridging the Gap between Collaborative Tagging Systems and Structured Data |
| ONTECTAS: Bridging the Gap between Collaborative Tagging Systems and Structured Data |
| ONTECTAS: Bridging the Gap between Collaborative Tagging Systems and Structured Data |
| ONTECTAS: Bridging the Gap between Collaborative Tagging Systems and Structured Data |
| ONTECTAS: Bridging the Gap between Collaborative Tagging Systems and Structured Data |
| ONTECTAS: Bridging the Gap between Collaborative Tagging Systems and Structured Data |
| ONTECTAS: Bridging the Gap between Collaborative Tagging Systems and Structured Data |
| ONTECTAS: Bridging the Gap between Collaborative Tagging Systems and Structured Data |
| ONTECTAS: Bridging the Gap between Collaborative Tagging Systems and Structured Data |
| ONTECTAS: Bridging the Gap between Collaborative Tagging Systems and Structured Data |
| ONTECTAS: Bridging the Gap between Collaborative Tagging Systems and Structured Data |
| ONTECTAS: Bridging the Gap between Collaborative Tagging Systems and Structured Data |
| ONTECTAS: Bridging the Gap between Collaborative Tagging Systems and Structured Data |
| ONTECTAS: Bridging the Gap between Collaborative Tagging Systems and Structured Data |
| ONTECTAS: Bridging the Gap between Collaborative Tagging Systems and Structured Data |
| Cognitive Complexity in Business Process Modeling |
| Cognitive Complexity in Business Process Modeling |
| Cognitive Complexity in Business Process Modeling |
| Cognitive Complexity in Business Process Modeling |
| Cognitive Complexity in Business Process Modeling |
| Cognitive Complexity in Business Process Modeling |
| Cognitive Complexity in Business Process Modeling |
| Cognitive Complexity in Business Process Modeling |
| Cognitive Complexity in Business Process Modeling |
| Cognitive Complexity in Business Process Modeling |
| Cognitive Complexity in Business Process Modeling |
| Cognitive Complexity in Business Process Modeling |
| Cognitive Complexity in Business Process Modeling |
| Cognitive Complexity in Business Process Modeling |
| Cognitive Complexity in Business Process Modeling |
| Human-Centered Process Engineering Based on Content Analysis and Process View Aggregation |
| Human-Centered Process Engineering Based on Content Analysis and Process View Aggregation |
| Human-Centered Process Engineering Based on Content Analysis and Process View Aggregation |
| Human-Centered Process Engineering Based on Content Analysis and Process View Aggregation |
| Human-Centered Process Engineering Based on Content Analysis and Process View Aggregation |
| Human-Centered Process Engineering Based on Content Analysis and Process View Aggregation |
| Human-Centered Process Engineering Based on Content Analysis and Process View Aggregation |
| Human-Centered Process Engineering Based on Content Analysis and Process View Aggregation |
| Human-Centered Process Engineering Based on Content Analysis and Process View Aggregation |
| Human-Centered Process Engineering Based on Content Analysis and Process View Aggregation |
| Human-Centered Process Engineering Based on Content Analysis and Process View Aggregation |
| Human-Centered Process Engineering Based on Content Analysis and Process View Aggregation |
| Human-Centered Process Engineering Based on Content Analysis and Process View Aggregation |
| Human-Centered Process Engineering Based on Content Analysis and Process View Aggregation |
| Human-Centered Process Engineering Based on Content Analysis and Process View Aggregation |
| Process Model Generation from Natural Language Text |
| Process Model Generation from Natural Language Text |
| Process Model Generation from Natural Language Text |
| Process Model Generation from Natural Language Text |
| Process Model Generation from Natural Language Text |
| Process Model Generation from Natural Language Text |
| Process Model Generation from Natural Language Text |
| Process Model Generation from Natural Language Text |
| Process Model Generation from Natural Language Text |
| Process Model Generation from Natural Language Text |
| Process Model Generation from Natural Language Text |
| Process Model Generation from Natural Language Text |
| Process Model Generation from Natural Language Text |
| Process Model Generation from Natural Language Text |
| Process Model Generation from Natural Language Text |
| A Semantic Approach for Business Process Model Abstraction |
| A Semantic Approach for Business Process Model Abstraction |
| A Semantic Approach for Business Process Model Abstraction |
| A Semantic Approach for Business Process Model Abstraction |
| A Semantic Approach for Business Process Model Abstraction |
| A Semantic Approach for Business Process Model Abstraction |
| A Semantic Approach for Business Process Model Abstraction |
| A Semantic Approach for Business Process Model Abstraction |
| A Semantic Approach for Business Process Model Abstraction |
| A Semantic Approach for Business Process Model Abstraction |
| A Semantic Approach for Business Process Model Abstraction |
| A Semantic Approach for Business Process Model Abstraction |
| A Semantic Approach for Business Process Model Abstraction |
| A Semantic Approach for Business Process Model Abstraction |
| A Semantic Approach for Business Process Model Abstraction |
| On the Automatic Labeling of Process Models |
| On the Automatic Labeling of Process Models |
| On the Automatic Labeling of Process Models |
| On the Automatic Labeling of Process Models |
| On the Automatic Labeling of Process Models |
| On the Automatic Labeling of Process Models |
| On the Automatic Labeling of Process Models |
| On the Automatic Labeling of Process Models |
| On the Automatic Labeling of Process Models |
| Pattern-Based Modeling and Formalizing of Business Process Quality Constraints |
| Pattern-Based Modeling and Formalizing of Business Process Quality Constraints |
| Pattern-Based Modeling and Formalizing of Business Process Quality Constraints |
| Pattern-Based Modeling and Formalizing of Business Process Quality Constraints |
| Pattern-Based Modeling and Formalizing of Business Process Quality Constraints |
| Pattern-Based Modeling and Formalizing of Business Process Quality Constraints |
| Pattern-Based Modeling and Formalizing of Business Process Quality Constraints |
| Pattern-Based Modeling and Formalizing of Business Process Quality Constraints |
| Pattern-Based Modeling and Formalizing of Business Process Quality Constraints |
| Pattern-Based Modeling and Formalizing of Business Process Quality Constraints |
| Pattern-Based Modeling and Formalizing of Business Process Quality Constraints |
| Pattern-Based Modeling and Formalizing of Business Process Quality Constraints |
| Pattern-Based Modeling and Formalizing of Business Process Quality Constraints |
| Pattern-Based Modeling and Formalizing of Business Process Quality Constraints |
| Pattern-Based Modeling and Formalizing of Business Process Quality Constraints |
| Quality Evaluation and Improvement Framework for Database Schemas - Using Defect Taxonomies |
| Quality Evaluation and Improvement Framework for Database Schemas - Using Defect Taxonomies |
| Quality Evaluation and Improvement Framework for Database Schemas - Using Defect Taxonomies |
| Quality Evaluation and Improvement Framework for Database Schemas - Using Defect Taxonomies |
| Quality Evaluation and Improvement Framework for Database Schemas - Using Defect Taxonomies |
| Quality Evaluation and Improvement Framework for Database Schemas - Using Defect Taxonomies |
| Quality Evaluation and Improvement Framework for Database Schemas - Using Defect Taxonomies |
| Quality Evaluation and Improvement Framework for Database Schemas - Using Defect Taxonomies |
| Quality Evaluation and Improvement Framework for Database Schemas - Using Defect Taxonomies |
| Quality Evaluation and Improvement Framework for Database Schemas - Using Defect Taxonomies |
| Quality Evaluation and Improvement Framework for Database Schemas - Using Defect Taxonomies |
| Quality Evaluation and Improvement Framework for Database Schemas - Using Defect Taxonomies |
| Quality Evaluation and Improvement Framework for Database Schemas - Using Defect Taxonomies |
| Quality Evaluation and Improvement Framework for Database Schemas - Using Defect Taxonomies |
| Quality Evaluation and Improvement Framework for Database Schemas - Using Defect Taxonomies |
| Validation of Families of Business Processes |
| Validation of Families of Business Processes |
| Validation of Families of Business Processes |
| Validation of Families of Business Processes |
| Validation of Families of Business Processes |
| Validation of Families of Business Processes |
| Validation of Families of Business Processes |
| Validation of Families of Business Processes |
| Validation of Families of Business Processes |
| Validation of Families of Business Processes |
| Validation of Families of Business Processes |
| Validation of Families of Business Processes |
| Validation of Families of Business Processes |
| Validation of Families of Business Processes |
| Validation of Families of Business Processes |
| Using SOA Governance Design Methodologies to Augment Enterprise Service Descriptions |
| Using SOA Governance Design Methodologies to Augment Enterprise Service Descriptions |
| Using SOA Governance Design Methodologies to Augment Enterprise Service Descriptions |
| Using SOA Governance Design Methodologies to Augment Enterprise Service Descriptions |
| Using SOA Governance Design Methodologies to Augment Enterprise Service Descriptions |
| Using SOA Governance Design Methodologies to Augment Enterprise Service Descriptions |
| Using SOA Governance Design Methodologies to Augment Enterprise Service Descriptions |
| Using SOA Governance Design Methodologies to Augment Enterprise Service Descriptions |
| Using SOA Governance Design Methodologies to Augment Enterprise Service Descriptions |
| Using SOA Governance Design Methodologies to Augment Enterprise Service Descriptions |
| Using SOA Governance Design Methodologies to Augment Enterprise Service Descriptions |
| Using SOA Governance Design Methodologies to Augment Enterprise Service Descriptions |
| Using SOA Governance Design Methodologies to Augment Enterprise Service Descriptions |
| Using SOA Governance Design Methodologies to Augment Enterprise Service Descriptions |
| Using SOA Governance Design Methodologies to Augment Enterprise Service Descriptions |
| Using SOA Governance Design Methodologies to Augment Enterprise Service Descriptions |
| Management Services – A Framework for Design |
| Management Services – A Framework for Design |
| Management Services – A Framework for Design |
| Management Services – A Framework for Design |
| Management Services – A Framework for Design |
| Management Services – A Framework for Design |
| Management Services – A Framework for Design |
| Management Services – A Framework for Design |
| Management Services – A Framework for Design |
| Management Services – A Framework for Design |
| Management Services – A Framework for Design |
| Management Services – A Framework for Design |
| Management Services – A Framework for Design |
| Management Services – A Framework for Design |
| Management Services – A Framework for Design |
| Bottom-Up Fault Management in Composite Web Services |
| Bottom-Up Fault Management in Composite Web Services |
| Bottom-Up Fault Management in Composite Web Services |
| Bottom-Up Fault Management in Composite Web Services |
| Bottom-Up Fault Management in Composite Web Services |
| Bottom-Up Fault Management in Composite Web Services |
| Bottom-Up Fault Management in Composite Web Services |
| Bottom-Up Fault Management in Composite Web Services |
| Bottom-Up Fault Management in Composite Web Services |
| Bottom-Up Fault Management in Composite Web Services |
| Bottom-Up Fault Management in Composite Web Services |
| Bottom-Up Fault Management in Composite Web Services |
| Bottom-Up Fault Management in Composite Web Services |
| Bottom-Up Fault Management in Composite Web Services |
| Bottom-Up Fault Management in Composite Web Services |
| Understanding the Diversity of Services Based on Users’ Identities |
| Understanding the Diversity of Services Based on Users’ Identities |
| Understanding the Diversity of Services Based on Users’ Identities |
| Understanding the Diversity of Services Based on Users’ Identities |
| Understanding the Diversity of Services Based on Users’ Identities |
| Understanding the Diversity of Services Based on Users’ Identities |
| Understanding the Diversity of Services Based on Users’ Identities |
| Understanding the Diversity of Services Based on Users’ Identities |
| Understanding the Diversity of Services Based on Users’ Identities |
| Understanding the Diversity of Services Based on Users’ Identities |
| Understanding the Diversity of Services Based on Users’ Identities |
| Understanding the Diversity of Services Based on Users’ Identities |
| Understanding the Diversity of Services Based on Users’ Identities |
| Understanding the Diversity of Services Based on Users’ Identities |
| Understanding the Diversity of Services Based on Users’ Identities |
| Request/Response Aspects for Web Services |
| Request/Response Aspects for Web Services |
| Request/Response Aspects for Web Services |
| Request/Response Aspects for Web Services |
| Request/Response Aspects for Web Services |
| Request/Response Aspects for Web Services |
| Request/Response Aspects for Web Services |
| Request/Response Aspects for Web Services |
| Request/Response Aspects for Web Services |
| Request/Response Aspects for Web Services |
| Request/Response Aspects for Web Services |
| Request/Response Aspects for Web Services |
| Request/Response Aspects for Web Services |
| Request/Response Aspects for Web Services |
| Request/Response Aspects for Web Services |
| Using Graph Aggregation for Service Interaction Message Correlation |
| Using Graph Aggregation for Service Interaction Message Correlation |
| Using Graph Aggregation for Service Interaction Message Correlation |
| Using Graph Aggregation for Service Interaction Message Correlation |
| Using Graph Aggregation for Service Interaction Message Correlation |
| Using Graph Aggregation for Service Interaction Message Correlation |
| Using Graph Aggregation for Service Interaction Message Correlation |
| Using Graph Aggregation for Service Interaction Message Correlation |
| Using Graph Aggregation for Service Interaction Message Correlation |
| Using Graph Aggregation for Service Interaction Message Correlation |
| Using Graph Aggregation for Service Interaction Message Correlation |
| Using Graph Aggregation for Service Interaction Message Correlation |
| Using Graph Aggregation for Service Interaction Message Correlation |
| Using Graph Aggregation for Service Interaction Message Correlation |
| Using Graph Aggregation for Service Interaction Message Correlation |
| Supporting Dynamic, People-Driven Processes through Self-learning of Message Flows |
| Supporting Dynamic, People-Driven Processes through Self-learning of Message Flows |
| Supporting Dynamic, People-Driven Processes through Self-learning of Message Flows |
| Supporting Dynamic, People-Driven Processes through Self-learning of Message Flows |
| Supporting Dynamic, People-Driven Processes through Self-learning of Message Flows |
| Supporting Dynamic, People-Driven Processes through Self-learning of Message Flows |
| Supporting Dynamic, People-Driven Processes through Self-learning of Message Flows |
| Supporting Dynamic, People-Driven Processes through Self-learning of Message Flows |
| Supporting Dynamic, People-Driven Processes through Self-learning of Message Flows |
| Supporting Dynamic, People-Driven Processes through Self-learning of Message Flows |
| Supporting Dynamic, People-Driven Processes through Self-learning of Message Flows |
| Supporting Dynamic, People-Driven Processes through Self-learning of Message Flows |
| Supporting Dynamic, People-Driven Processes through Self-learning of Message Flows |
| Supporting Dynamic, People-Driven Processes through Self-learning of Message Flows |
| Supporting Dynamic, People-Driven Processes through Self-learning of Message Flows |
| Business Process Service Oriented Methodology (BPSOM) with Service Generation in SoaML |
| Business Process Service Oriented Methodology (BPSOM) with Service Generation in SoaML |
| Business Process Service Oriented Methodology (BPSOM) with Service Generation in SoaML |
| Business Process Service Oriented Methodology (BPSOM) with Service Generation in SoaML |
| Business Process Service Oriented Methodology (BPSOM) with Service Generation in SoaML |
| Business Process Service Oriented Methodology (BPSOM) with Service Generation in SoaML |
| Business Process Service Oriented Methodology (BPSOM) with Service Generation in SoaML |
| Business Process Service Oriented Methodology (BPSOM) with Service Generation in SoaML |
| Business Process Service Oriented Methodology (BPSOM) with Service Generation in SoaML |
| Panel on Green and Sustainable IS |