Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
the added intentional element is really new or not. In particular, note that this
jUCMNav model is identical to the previous one, clearly showing the lack of bijec-
tion with respect to this particular point. Output 3 in Figure 6.
−
Row 4: agent as instance of actor. Although the agent is converted into actor
(decreasing modulo variation), the instance link is lost. Eliminating semantic pres-
ervation: the element can not be kept and is removed. Informational loss. Output 4
in Figure 6.
We remark that we are not proposing specific semantic equivalences from one variant
to another, we are just showing a proof-of-concept of our approach by describing a
general procedure to maximize semantic preservation reducing the complexity of
Table 3.
Classification of specific model translations from OME to jUCMNav
from OME
to jUCMNav
