Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Acknowledgments.
We would like to acknowledge the support provided by
Methodus to our research work in the scope of an innovation project partly
financed by QREN.
References
1. PricewaterhouseCoopers: 8th annual global CEO survey (2004),
http://www.grc-resource.com/resources/
pwc integritydrivenperformance.pdf
2. Racz, N., Weippl, E., Seufert, A.: A Frame of Reference for Research of Integrated
Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC). In: De Decker, B., Schaumuller-Bichl,
I. (eds.) CMS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6109, pp. 106-117. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
3. Hagerty, J., Kraus, B.: GRC in 2010: $29.8B in Spending Sparked by Risk, Visi-
bility, and Eciency (2009)
4. Racz, N., Weippl, E., Seufert, A.: Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) Software
An Exploratory Study of Software Vendor and Market Research Perspectives. In:
Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2011)
5. Gill, S., Purushottam, U.: Integrated GRC - Is your Organization Ready to Move?
In: Governance, Risk and Compliance. SETLabs Briefings, PP. 37-46 (2008)
6. Moody, D.L., Shanks, G.G.: Improving the Quality of Data Models: Empirical
Validation of a Quality Management Framework. Inf. Syst. 28, 619-650 (2003)
7. Frank, U.: Conceptual Modelling as the Core of the Information Systems Discipline:
Perspectives and Epistemological Challenges. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Amer-
ica's Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 1999), Milwaukee, Association
for Information Systems, pp. 695-698 (1999)
8. Recker, J.C.: Conceptual Model Evaluation. Towards more Paradigmatic Rigor. In:
Halpin, T., Siau, K., Krogstie, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Evaluating
Modeling Methods for Systems Analysis and Design (EMMSAD 2005), Held in
Conjunctiun with the 17th Conference on Advanced Information Systems (CAiSE
2005), Porto, Portugal, EU, FEUP (2005)
9. Jeusfeld, M.A., Jarke, M., Nissen, H.W., Staudt, M.: ConceptBase: Managing Con-
ceptual Models about Information Systems. In: Bernus, P., Mertins, K., Schmidt,
G. (eds.) Handbook on Architectures of Information Systems. International Hand-
books Information System, pp. 273-294. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
10. Schermann, M., Bohmann, T., Krcmar, H.: Explicating Design Theories with Con-
ceptual Models: Towards a Theoretical Role of Reference Models. In: Becker, J.,
Krcmar, H., Niehaves, B. (eds.) Wissenschaftstheorie und Gestaltungsorientierte
Wirtschaftsinformatik, pp. 175-194. Physica-Verlag, HD (2009)
11. Schon, D.A.: The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic
Books, New York (1983)
12. Simon, H.A.: The Sciences of the Artificial - 3rd Edition, 3rd edn. The MIT Press,
Cambridge (1996)
13. Shanks, G., Tansley, E., Weber, R.: Using Ontology to Validate Conceptual Models.
Commun. ACM 46, 85-89 (2003)
14. Jarvelin, K., Wilson, T.D.: On Conceptual Models for Information Seeking and
Retrieval Research. Information Research 9 (2003)
15. OCEG: GRC Capability Model (2009),
http://www.oceg.com
16. March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural science research on information tech-
nology. Decis. Support Syst. 15, 251-266 (1995)
