Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
engineer has modified their psychological processes for theory building and so
the corresponding implications for software engineering education.
References
1. Fetzer, J.H.: The role of models in computer science. The Monist 82(1), 20-36
(1999)
2. Floyd, C.: Eine untersuchung von software-entwicklings-methoden. In: Morgen-
brod, H., Sammer, W., Tagung, I. (eds.) Programmierumgebugnen und Compiler,
Tuebner Verlag (1984)
3. Hoppenbrouwers, S., Proper, H.A., der Weide, T.P.: A fundamental view on the
process of conceptual modeling. In: Delcambre, L.M.L., Kop, C., Mayr, H.C., My-
lopoulos, J., Pastor, Ó. (eds.) ER 2005. LNCS, vol. 3716, pp. 128-143. Springer,
Heidelberg (2005)
4. Johnson, P., Ekstedt, M., Silva, E., Plazaola, L.: Using enterprise architecture for
cio decision-making: On the importance of theory. In: The Proceedings of the 2nd
Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research, CSER (2004)
5. Kruchten, P.: Documentation of Software Architecture from a Knowledge Manage-
ment Perspective-Design Representation. Software Architecture Knowledge Man-
agement, 39-57
6. Lankhorst, M.: Enterprise architecture at work: Modelling, communication and
analysis. Springer-Verlag New York Inc., Heidelberg (2009)
7. Lankhorst, M.M., Proper, H.A., Jonkers, J.: The Anatomy of the ArchiMate Lan-
guage. International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design 1(1)
8. Moody, D.L.: Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of con-
ceptual models: current state and future directions. Data & Knowledge Engineer-
ing 55(3), 243-276 (2005)
9. Moor, J.H.: Three myths of computer science. British Journal for the Philosophy
of Science 29(3), 213-222 (1978)
10. Naur, P.: Computing: a human activity. ACM, New York (1992)
11. Naur, P.: Programming as theory building. Microprocessing and Microprogram-
ming 15(5), 253-261 (1985)
12. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The knowledge-creating company, New York, vol. 1 (1995)
13. Pask, G.: Conversation, cognition and learning. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1975)
14. Pohl, K.: The three dimensions of requirements engineering: A framework and its
applications* 1. Information Systems 19(3), 243-258 (1994)
15. Ryle, G.: The concept ofmind, London, Hutchinson (1949)
16. Smith, B.C.: Limits of correctness in computers. Academic Press Professional, Inc.,
London (1991)
17. Spencer, J., et al.: TOGAF Enterprise Edition Version 8.1 (2004)
18. Toulmin, S.E.: The uses of argument. Cambridge Univ Pr., Cambridge (2003)
19. Wisnosky, D.E., Vogel, J.: DoDAF Wizdom: A Practical Guide to Planning, Man-
aging and Executing Projects to Build Enterprise Architectures Using the Depart-
ment of Defense Architecture Framework, DoDAF (2004)
20. Wyssusek, B.: A philosophical re-appraisal of peter naur's notion of programming
as theory building. In: European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS (2007)
21. Zachman, J.A.: A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems
Journal 38(2/3), 454-470 (1999)
