Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
3. Creswell, J.W.: Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods
approaches. Sage Pubns, Thousand Oaks (2008)
4. Davis, A., Dieste, O., Hickey, A., Juristo, N., Moreno, A.: Effectiveness of require-
ments elicitation techniques: Empirical results derived from a systematic review.
In: 14th IEEE International Conference Requirements Engineering, pp. 179-188
(2006)
5. van Dongen, B., van der Aalst, W., Verbeek, H.: Verification of ePCs: Using re-
duction rules and petri nets. In: Pastor, O., Falcao e Cunha, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2005.
LNCS, vol. 3520, pp. 372-386. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
6. Field, A.: Discovering statistics using SPSS. SAGE publications Ltd, Thousand
Oaks (2009)
7. Frederiks, P.J.M., Van der Weide, T.P.: Information modeling: the process and the
required competencies of its participants. Data & Knowledge Engineering 58(1),
4-20 (2006)
8. Grosskopf, A., Weske, M.: On business process model reviews. In: CAiSE 2010, pp.
31-42. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
9. Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business
revolution. Collins Business (2003)
10. Holschke, O., Rake, J., Levina, O.: Granularity as a cognitive factor in the effective-
ness of business process model reuse. In: Dayal, U., Eder, J., Koehler, J., Reijers,
H.A. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5701, pp. 245-260. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
11. Ishii, H., Ullmer, B.: Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people,
bits and atoms. In: SIGCHI, pp. 234-241. ACM, New York (1997)
12. Jedlitschka, A., Ciolkowski, M., Pfahl, D.: Reporting experiments in software engi-
neering. Guide to Advanced Empirical Software Engineering, 201-228 (2008)
13. Kirk, J., Miller, M.: Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Sage Publica-
tions, Inc., Newbury Park (1986)
14. Landis, J., Koch, G.: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.
Biometrics 33(1), 159-174 (1977)
15. Luebbe, A., Weske, M.: The effect of tangible media on individuals in business
process modeling - a controlled experiment. Tech. Rep. 41, Hasso-Plattner-Institute
for IT Systems Engineering (2010),
http://bpt.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/Public/AlexanderGrosskopf
16. Persson, A.: Enterprise modelling in practice: situational factors and their influence
on adopting a participative approach. Ph.D. thesis, Stockholm University (2001)
17. Recker, J., Rosemann, M.: The measurement of perceived ontological deficiencies
of conceptual modeling grammars. Data & Knowledge Engineering (2010)
18. Rittgen, P.: Success factors of e-collaboration in business process modeling. In:
Pernici, B. (ed.) CAiSE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6051, pp. 24-37. Springer, Heidelberg
(2010)
19. Schaufeli, W., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V., Bakker, A.: The measurement
of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach.
Journal of Happiness Studies 3(1), 71-92 (2002)
20. Schneider, K.: Generating Fast Feedback in Requirements Elicitation. In: Sawyer,
P., Heymans, P. (eds.) REFSQ 2007. LNCS, vol. 4542, pp. 160-174. Springer, Hei-
delberg (2007)
21. Sedera, W., Gable, G., Rosemann, M., Smyth, R.: A success model for business
process modeling: findings from a multiple case study. In: PACIS, Shanghai (2004)
22. Stevenson, A.: Oxford Dictionary of English, vol. 24. Oxford University Press,
Oxford (2010)
