Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
applications 2.0 and Rich Internet Applications (RIA) that are developed thorough an
MDWD process; to perform controlled experiments in order to assess the effective-
ness and ease of use of WUEP by comparing it to other usability evaluation methods;
and finally, to develop a tool with the capability of automating a large part of the
evaluation process.
Acknowledgments. This research work is funded by the MULTIPLE project
(TIN2009-13838) and the FPU program (AP2007-03731) from the Spanish Ministry
of Science and Education.
References
1. Abrahão, S., Iborra, E., Vanderdonckt, J.: Usability Evaluation of User Interfaces Gener-
ated with a Model-Driven Architecture Tool. In: Maturing Usability: Quality in Software,
Interaction and Value, Springer, pp. 3-32 (2007)
2. Abrahão, S., Insfran, E.: Early Usability Evaluation in Model-Driven Architecture Envi-
ronments. In: 6th IEEE International Conference on Quality Software (QSIC 2006), pp.
287-294. IEEE Computer Society, Beijing (2006)
3. Atterer, R., Schmidt, A.: Adding Usability to Web Engineering Models and Tools. In:
Lowe, D.G., Gaedke, M. (eds.) ICWE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3579, pp. 36-41. Springer, Hei-
delberg (2005)
4. Blackmon, M.H., Polson, P.G., Kitajima, M., Lewis, C.: Cognitive Walkthrough for the
Web. In: Proc. of the ACM CHI 2002, USA, pp. 463-470 (2002)
5. Botafogo, R., Rivlin, E., Shneiderman, B.: Structural analysis of hypertexts: Identifying
hierarchies and useful metrics. ACM Trans. Inf. Systems 10(2), 142-180 (1992)
6. Calero, C., Ruiz, J., Piattini, M.: Classifying Web metrics using the Web quality model.
Online Information Review Journal. Emerald Group. 29(3), 227-248 (2005)
7. Casteleyn, S., Daniel, F., Dolog, P., Matera, M.: Engineering Web Applications. Springer,
Heidelberg (2009)
8. Ceri, S., Fraternali, P., Bongio, A.: Web Modeling Language (WebML): A Modeling Lan-
guage for Designing Web Sites. In: Proc. of the 9th WWW Conf., pp. 137-157 (2000)
9. Cockton, G., Lavery, D., Woolrychn, A.: Inspection-based evaluations. In: Jacko, J.A.,
Sears, A. (eds.) The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, 2nd edn., pp. 1171-1190
(2003)
10. Conte, T., Massollar, J., Mendes, E., Travassos, G.H.: Usability Evaluation Based on Web
Design Perspectives. In: 1st Int. Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and
Measurement (ESEM 2007), Spain, pp. 146-155 (2007)
11. Fernandez, A., Insfran, E., Abrahão, S.: Integrating a Usability Model into Model-Driven
Web Development Processes. In: Vossen, G., Long, D.D.E., Yu, J.X. (eds.) WISE 2009.
LNCS, vol. 5802, pp. 497-510. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
12. Fernandez, A., Insfran, E., Abrahão, S.: Usability Evaluation Methods for the Web: A
Systematic Mapping Study. In: Information and Software Technology (2011),
doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2011.02.007
13. Gomez, J., Cachero, C., Pastor, O.: Conceptual Modeling of Device-Independent Web
Applications. IEEE MultiMedia 8(2), 26-39 (2001)
14. Ivory, M.Y.: An Empirical Foundation for Automated Web Interface Evaluation. PhD
Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, Computer Science Division (2001)
15. ISO/IEC 9126-1 Standard, Software Engineering, Product Quality - Part 1: Quality Model
(2001)
16. ISO/IEC 25000 series, Software Engineering, Software Product Quality Requirements and
Evaluation, SQuaRE (2005)
Search WWH ::




Custom Search