Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
References
1. Rosemann, M.: Potential pitfalls of process modeling: part a. Business Process
Management Journal 12(2), 249-254 (2006)
2. Eshuis, R., Grefen, P.: Constructing customized process views. Data Knowl.
Eng. 64(2), 419-438 (2008)
3. Polyvyanyy, A., Smirnov, S., Weske, M.: Process model abstraction: A slider ap-
proach. In: Proceedings of EDOC (2008)
4. Smirnov, S., Reijers, H.A., Nugteren, T., Weske, M.: Business Process Model Ab-
straction: Theory and Practice. Technical Report 35 (2010)
5. Reijers, H.A., Mendling, J.: Modularity in process models: Review and effects. In:
Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp.
20-35. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
6. Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., Recker, J.: Activity labeling in process modeling: Em-
pirical insights and recommendations. Inf. Syst. 35(4), 467-482 (2010)
7. Keller, G., Teufel, T.: Sap R/3 Process Oriented Implementation. Addison-Wesley
Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston (1998)
8. Reijers, H., Limam, S., van der Aalst, W.: Product-based workflow design. Journal
of Management Information Systems 20(1), 229-262 (2003)
9. Leopold, H., Smirnov, S., Mendling, J.: Refactoring of process model activity labels.
In: Hopfe, C.J., Rezgui, Y., Metais, E., Preece, A., Li, H. (eds.) NLDB 2010. LNCS,
vol. 6177, pp. 268-276. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
10. Decker, G., Mendling, J.: Process instantiation. Data Knowl. Eng. 68(9), 777-792
(2009)
11. Leopold, H.: Modularization of business process models using natural language
techniques. Master's thesis, Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin (2010)
12. Eshuis, R., Grefen, P.: Constructing Customized Process Views. Data Knowl.
Eng. 64(2), 419-438 (2008)
13. Gunther, C.W., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Fuzzy Mining - Adaptive Process Simplifi-
cation Based on Multi-perspective Metrics. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann,
M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 328-343. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
14. Smirnov, S., Weidlich, M., Mendling, J.: Business process model abstraction based
on behavioral profiles. In: Maglio, P.P., Weske, M., Yang, J., Fantinato, M. (eds.)
ICSOC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6470, pp. 1-16. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
15. Smirnov, S., Dijkman, R., Mendling, J., Weske, M.: Meronymy-based aggregation
of activities in business process models. In: Parsons, J., Saeki, M., Shoval, P., Woo,
C., Wand, Y. (eds.) ER 2010. LNCS, vol. 6412, pp. 1-14. Springer, Heidelberg
(2010)
16. Ehrig, M., Koschmider, A., Oberweis, A.: Measuring similarity between semantic
business process models. In: Proceedings of APCCM, pp. 71-80 (2007)
17. van Dongen, B.F., Dijkman, R., Mendling, J.: Measuring similarity between busi-
ness process models. In: Bellahsene, Z., Leonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS,
vol. 5074, pp. 450-464. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
18. Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., van Dongen, B., Kaarik, R., Mendling, J.: Similarity of
business process models: Metrics and evaluation. Inf. Systems 36, 498-516 (2010)
19. Weidlich, M., Dijkman, R., Mendling, J.: The iCoP framework: Identification of
correspondences between process models. In: Pernici, B. (ed.) CAiSE 2010. LNCS,
vol. 6051, pp. 483-498. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
20. Lin, Y., Ding, H.: Ontology-based semantic annotation for semantic interoperability
of process models. In: Proc. of CIMCA/IAWTIC, pp. 162-167 (2005)
