Abstract
Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a bioactive lipid mediator with crucial roles in a wide variety of cellular functions across a broad range of organisms. Though a simple molecule in structure, S1P functions are complex. The formation of S1P is catalyzed by one of two sphingosine kinases that have differential cellular distributions as well as both overlapping and opposing functions and which are activated by many different stimuli. S1P can act on a family of G protein-coupled receptors (S1PRs) that are also differentially expressed in different cell types, which influences the cellular responses to S1P. In addition to acting on receptors located on the plasma membrane, S1P can also function inside the cell, independently of S1PRs. It also appears that both the intracellular location and the isotype of sphingosine kinase involved are major determinants of inside-out signaling of S1P in response to many extracellular stimuli. This topic is focused on the current literature on extracellular and intracellular actions of S1P.
Introduction
In just over a decade, the sphingolipid metabolite, sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), has emerged as a key regulator of numerous physiological functions, including cell growth and survival, angio-genesis, cell motility and migration and lymphocyte trafficking.1 S1P promotes cell growth and inhibits apoptosis, while its precursors, ceramide and sphingosine, typically inhibit cell growth and induce apoptosis.1 Therefore, the cellular balance of these three sphingolipid metabolites, the "sphingolipid rheostat", is of crucial importance in regulating cell fate.1 Moreover, sphingolipid metabolism has been found to be dysregulated in many human diseases, including cancer, inflammation, atherosclerosis and asthma.2 S1P is produced intracellularly by two sphingosine kinases (SphK1 and SphK2) and is the ligand for a family of five G protein-coupled receptors, termed S1P1-5. However, there are some actions of S1P that appear to be independent of the known S1PRs. This review will focus on the emerging evidence for S1P as a second messenger.
Sphingolipid Metabolism
Sphingolipids are ubiquitous components of the lipid bilayer of eukaryotic cells. Like glyc-erolipids, numerous agonists regulate sphingolipid metabolism to generate signaling molecules, including ceramide (N-acyl sphingosine), sphingosine and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P).1,3,4 Ceramide, the backbone of all sphingolipids, is produced both by de novo synthesis and by turnover of sphingolipids, such as hydrolysis ofsphingomyelin by sphingomyelinases. It is important to note that sphingosine is not produced de novo and is only formed by catabolism of sphingolipids. The 3-ketosphinganine formed is rapidly reduced to dihydrosphingosine, which is subsequently N-acylated by one of a family of six (dihydro)ceramide synthases (CerS, formerly referred to as LASS) to form dihydroceramide, with the CerSs having differing but overlapping preferences for acyl chains from 16 to 26 carbons long. Finally, a 4-5 trans double bond is introduced in the sphingoid base to produce ceramide. Ceramide is then trafficked from the ER to the Golgi, where a variety of head groups are added, forming sphingolipids. After removal of these head groups during catabolism, deacylation of ceramide by ceramidases yields sphingosine, the most common sphingoid base in mammals. It is important to note that sphingosine and dihydrosphingosine (sphinganine) are not produced de novo and are only formed by catabolism of sphingolipids. These sphingoid bases can be re-utilized for complex sphingolipid biosynthesis or phosphorylated by two sphingosine kinases (SphK1 and SphK2) to form S1P. S1P can be degraded either by reversible dephosphorylation to sphingosine by phosphatases, including lysosomal phosphatases, members of the LPP family oflipid-specific phosphatases and two S1P-specific phosphatases, termed SPP1 and SPP2 (reviewed in 5), or degraded by irreversible cleavage to ethanolamine phosphate and hexadecenal by S1P lyase (SPL).
Ceramide and sphingosine, the precursors of S1P, are important regulatory components of stress responses, typically inducing growth arrest and apoptosis.3,4 In contrast, S1P has been implicated in motility and cytoskeletal rearrangements, formation ofadherens junctions, proliferation, survival, angiogenesis and the trafficking of immune cells.1,7-9 Thus, the dynamic balance between S1P and ceramide and the consequent regulation of opposing signaling pathways, is an important factor that determines cell fate.10 S1P produces many ofits effects by acting as a ligand for one or more of its five receptors, discussed below. However, although intracellular targets for both ceramide and sphingosine have been identified, indicating they are both bona fide second messengers, intracel-lular targets for S1P have remained elusive.
Sphingosine Kinases
Oddly, like mammalian SphKs, two SphK isoenzymes are also found in organisms as diverse as yeast, slime molds, worms, flies and mammals.7 In mammals, both SphKs have a broad and overlapping tissue distribution, with SphK1 predominating in lung and spleen and SphK2 predominating in the heart, brain and liver.11,12 Both SphKs are members of the diacylglycerol kinase family, containing five conserved domains responsible for substrate binding and catalytic activ-ity.13 Differential activation of SphKs can be determined by in vitro assays, as detergents stimulate SphK1 and inhibit SphK2.12 Conversely, SphK2 is stimulated by high salt, whereas SphK1 is inhibited. SphK1 and SphK2 have similar endogenous substrate specificities, with both being able to phosphorylate d-erythro-dihydrosphingosine and d-erythro-sphingosine, the two mammalian sphingoid bases.11,13 Cells contain both S1P and dihydro-S1P and both activate cell surface S1PRs with essentially the same affinity (see below). S1P predominates both in cells and plasma and thus for the purposes of this review "S1P" will refer to all phosphorylated sphingoid bases, including phyto-S1P found in yeast and plants, unless otherwise indicated. SphK1 and SphK2 are primarily cytosolic, although their distributions are altered in different cell types and by various signals (see below). Homozygous single knockouts of either isoenzyme are viable and there are also no obvious phenotypes in yeast14 or mice,15,16 suggesting that they may have redundant, overlapping, or compensatory functions. Intriguingly, there is no functional redundancy in Drosophila, as deletion of Sk2 but not Sk1 results in flight defects and reduced fecundity.17 In yeast, even the double knockouts are viable.14 However, when Sphk1~!~ and Sphk2mice were crossed, mice lacking 1 to 3 of the Sphk alleles appeared normal, but mice lacking all four alleles died in utero due to defective brain and cardiovascular system development.16 This suggests that SphK1 and SphK2 are redundant in mammals, at least for viability. However, subtle yet significant phenotypic differences in Sphk1~!~ and Sphk2r^ mice are emerging and the apparent functional redundancy may not apply to a variety of pathophysiological conditions, suggesting that isozyme-specific targeting of SphKs may be an effective means of disease control or prevention.
SphKl
SphK1a is a 48 kDa splice variant that was cloned utilizing peptide sequences from SphK1 purified to homogeneity from rat kidneys.11 Most investigations of the role of SphK1 have focused on SphK1a, the major splice form, although two N-terminal extension splice variants have been described in humans, SphK1b (+14 aa) and SphK1c (+86 aa), all with similar enzymatic properties.18 SphK1 isoforms are predominantly cytosolic but have slightly different subcellular distributions, with SphK1b and SphK1c having greater plasma membrane localization.19 Interestingly, extracellular secretion of SphK1a, by unknown mechanisms through a Golgi-independent route has been described,19 although the biological significance of this is not yet clear. SphK1 was initially purified in part based on its ability to bind to a calcium-calmodulin column.20 Subsequently, it was shown that SphK1 has a calmodulin binding site between residues 191-206, the mutation of which blocks agonist-induced SphK1 translocation to the plasma membrane, but not its activation.21 An important advance in understanding regulation of SphK1 was the demonstration that SphK1 is phosphorylated on Ser225 by ERK1/2,22 which was necessary but not sufficient for its targeting to the plasma membrane.23 SphK1 has been shown to physically interact with a number of proteins that may affect its cellular localization, including RPK118,24 PECAM-1,25 Acy126 and S-catenin/NPRAP,27 among others. SphK1 is activated by diverse stimuli, including hormones, growth factors, immunoglobulin receptor crosslinking, cytokines, chemokines and lysolipids, including S1P.1 Functionally, numerous studies have demonstrated a role for S1P produced by SphK1 in protection of cells from apoptosis, promotion of cell growth, stimulation of motility and tumorigenesis and as an essential component of many signaling pathways, activating kinases, phospholipases and inducing calcium release (reviewed in refs. 1, 8, 28, 29). Indeed, many of the pro-growth and anti-apoptotic effects observed by exogenous addition of S1P can be reproduced by overexpression of SphK1.
SphK2
Much less is known about SphK2, which was cloned in mammalian cells based on its homology to SphK1.12 SphK2 has two splice variants. The smaller, originally cloned SphK2-S, contains 618 amino acids and the N-terminally extended SphK2-L, consists of 654 amino acids.30 SphK2-L is expressed in human cells but not in mice and is reported to be the predominant SphK2 mRNA in most cell lines and tissues except brain and kidney.30 SphK1 and SphK2 have similar abilities to phosphorylate endogenous substrates, but SphK2 is mainly responsible for phosphorylation of the immunosuppressive pro-drug, FTY720.15,31,32 SphK2 was found to be a two hybrid interac-tor with the cytoplasmic domain of the IL-12 receptor P1 and SphK2 overexpression enhanced IL-12-mediated signaling.33 SphK2 also binds calmodulin at a site that is conserved between the SphKs, although unlike SphK1, interaction with calmodulin does not alter SphK2 localization.21 SphK2 contains a putative BH3 domain that has been shown to contribute to the ability of overexpressed SphK2 to induce apoptosis in a variety of cell types.34 In contrast to SphK1, only a few agonists have been reported to activate SphK2, including EGF,35 IgE receptor crosslinking36 and IL-1P and TNFa.37 Of note, EGF activates SphK2 and induces phosphorylation on Ser351 and Thr578, both dependent on ERK1.38 Moreover, this phosphorylation was required for SphK2-enhanced cell migration towards EGF.38 Intriguingly, although SphK2 expression typically inhibits growth, promotes apoptosis and chemosensitizes several cell types,30,34,39,40 SphK2 protects MCF-7 breast cancer cells and HCT116 colon cancer cells from doxorubicin-induced apoptosis by a pathway mediated by p53-independent upregulation of p21.41
SphKl vs. SphK2
Even though mice with single knockouts of Sphkl and Sphk2 are viable with few obvious phe-notypes, suggesting that the SphKs have redundant functions, the kinases exhibit many differences in a variety of experimental systems. Indeed, several studies have shown that the two SphKs in yeast, Lcb3p and Lcb4p, do not complement one another (e.g., ref. 42), although this may be due to the much higher activity of Lcb4p. Moreover, both SphKs, in yeast as well as mammals, have overlapping but distinct subcellular localizations, suggesting that they may interact with different proteins and/or lipids and utilize different sphingoid base substrate pools. The first clues that eukaryotic SphK1 and SphK2 may differ functionally came from the observations that, in contrast to many reports demonstrating a pro-growth, anti-apoptotic role for SphK1, SphK2 overexpression induced growth arrest and cell death.30,34,39 Consistent with these results, SphK1 decreased, while SphK2 increased, the sensitivity of several different cell lines to a variety of chemotherapeutic drugs.34,40 However, other studies have revealed that SphK2 knockdown reduced proliferation of glioblastoma cell lines.43 The cell culture results demonstrating a role for SphK1 in cell growth and apoptosis are likely pathophysiological^ relevant, as SphK1 is overexpressed in a number of solid tumors, including breast, ovary, kidney, brain, stomach and kidney.43,44 Perhaps because of its role as a promoter of apoptosis, SphK2 but not SphK1 was reported to be responsible for the secretion of S1P during apoptosis ofJurkat T-cells induced by staurosporin.45 Conversely, in hematopoietic cancer cells, it was recently shown that SphK1 produced the S1P that was secreted in response to doxorubicin-induced apoptosis.46
The differential effects of the two SphKs on cell fate are due in part to their different roles in regulating ceramide levels. SphK1 expression decreases ceramide levels, likely by inhibiting ceramide synthases.47,48 Conversely, SphK2 expression increases ceramide levels by increasing the salvage of sphingoid bases.47 In a pathway that is conserved in yeast,42 exogenous sphingoid bases must first be phosphorylated by a specific SphK (Lcb4p or SphK2), then dephosphorylated by a specific SPP (Lcb3p or SPP1).49,50 This cycle enables cells to re-acylate sphingoid bases to ceramides and likely represents a control point that cells use to regulate the amount of ceramide and sphingolipids at the levels ofde novo synthesis (SphK1) and salvage of sphingoid bases (SphK2). SphK1 and SphK2 also appear to have different roles in the uptake of S1P, with SphK1 but not SphK2 cooperating in another phosphorylation/dephosphorylation cycle that utilizes cell surface LPP-1 to promote sphingoid base uptake.51
Differential effects of SphK1 and SphK2 are also apparent in transduction of signals from cell surface receptors. Perhaps because it was cloned first and thus is more well studied, SphK1-dependent formation ofS1P has been found to be an important component ofnumerous receptor signaling pathways, but even in cases where participation of both SphK1 and SphK2 have been examined, it is still SphK1 that is typically implicated. To cite a few examples, estradiol activates SphK1, but not SphK2, ultimately leading to EGFR activation in MCF-7 cells52; similarly, VEGF-induced activation of ERK1/2 in T24 bladder cancer cells requires SphK1 but not SphK253; moreover, targeting SphK1 but not SphK2 with siRNA also blocks TNFa-induced COX-2 induction and PGE2 secretion.54
Many studies have demonstrated a role for S1P and S1PRs in cell motility (reviewed in ref. 55) and SphK1, but not SphK2, has often been reported to be the source of S1P. For example, EGF stimulates the activity and translocation ofSphK1 to lamellipodia in MCF-7 cells and overexpression of SphK1 enhances migration towards EGF.56 EGF also has been shown to stimulate both SphK1 and SphK2 in HEK 293 cells, but only SphK1 was required for EGF-induced motility.35 The lack of requirement for SphK2 in these cells is the more remarkable because SphK2 is already localized at the plasma membrane and suggests that a SphK may need to be targeted to a specific sub-compartment of the plasma membrane, perhaps in close proximity to its substrate and specific S1PRs and/or perhaps S1P transporter(s). Intriguingly, EGF also stimulates both SphK1 and SphK2 in MDA-MB-453 cells, but in these breast cancer cells, both SphKs are required for EGF-induced motility.35
The roles of S1P in the immune system are complex and deciphering which SphK isozyme is involved is a challenging task. It has been shown that SphK1, but not SphK2, is required for degranulation of rat RBL-2H3 mast cells in response to IgE receptor crosslinking.57 In contrast, in mouse bone marrow-derived mast cells, both SphK1 and SphK2 are activated by IgE receptor crosslinking in a Fyn-dependent manner.36 Interestingly, SphK1 and SphK2 have different requirements for effectors downstream of Fyn, suggesting other levels of regulation of SphK activation. These authors also showed that exogenous S1P could only partially restore degranulation to Fyn’1′ mice, hinting at an intracellular role for S1P (discussed below). This group later took advantage of Sphk1~!~ and Sphk2r^ double knockout mice to demonstrate that in fetal liver-derived and bone marrow-derived mast cells, only SphK2 was responsible for IgE receptor triggered degranula-tion and cytokine release.58 However, in a passive systemic anaphylaxis model, they found that Sphk2r^ mice fared as well or slightly worse than wild-type mice in terms of increased plasma histamine levels. Conversely, Sphk1~!~ mice had reduced plasma histamine levels. Sphk1~!~ mice also had reduced plasma S1P levels compared to wild type and Sphk2r^ mice and the intensity of the histamine released positively correlated with circulating S1P levels. The triple allele knockout Sphk1+/~Sphk2rl~ mice had the lowest histamine responses and had plasma S1P levels as low as the Sphk1^~ mice. Thus, mast cell function in mice is determined both by SphK2 in mast cells (intrinsic S1P) and circulating S1P levels determined by nonmast cell SphK1 (extrinsic S1P). In contrast, in both human LAD2 mast cells and human umbilical cord blood-derived mast cells, knockdown of SphK1 expression decreased degranulation, cytokine release and motility in response to IgE/ antigen.59 Conversely, SphK2 was dispensable for antigen-induced degranulation, motility, or release of most cytokines.59 S1P likely also plays important roles in other types of immune cells, although neutrophil function in cells isolated from Sphk1 or Sphk2~!~ mice, or even in the whole animals themselves, showed little observable differences between the knockouts and wild type. The Sphk2r^ mice did have increased disease progression in a lung infection model.60 Differences between mouse and human immune systems remain to be resolved, but will likely require SphK isozyme-specific inhibitors to elucidate the roles for the SphK1 and SphK2 in mast cell functions and development.
S1P Receptors
S1P is a ligand for five specific GPCRs, S1P1-5, formerly called endothelial differentiation gene (EDG) receptors, which are differentially expressed in different tissues. The cell type specific expression of S1PRs, as well as their differential coupling to different G proteins, explains the diverse signaling of S1P.61 As mentioned above, many stimuli, including hormones, immunoglobulin receptor ligation, growth factors and cytokines, activate cytosolic SphKs and the production of S1P that is required for the full activity of these agonists. In many cases, the S1P produced activates cell surface S1PRs in a paracrine and/or autocrine manner (reviewed in ref. 62). Indeed, many of the downstream effects of these stimuli require transactivation of one or more S1PRs, also called "inside-out" signaling. For example, in MCF-7 cells, estradiol stimulates ERK1/2 though a mechanism that requires at least two autocrine signaling loops.52 In the first loop, estradiol stimulates SphK1 and formation of S1P leading to activation of S1P3. In the second loop, S1P3 activates the metalloproteinase MMP-9, which in turn releases EGF from the EGF-heparin binding protein and activates EGFR, finally leading to ERK1/2 phosphorylation.52 How transactivation of S1PRs is accomplished is an intriguing puzzle as the SphKs and S1P production are both on the cytosolic side of the plasma membrane and S1PRs bind S1P on the exoplasmic side. While it has been suggested that SphK proteins themselves may be secreted and produce S1P extracellularly,19 it has been convincingly shown that the AB CC1 transporter mediates secretion of intracellularly produced S1P from mast cells.63 Moreover, S1PR transactivation is not only regulated by S1P secretion, cellular levels of S1P are also important, as decreasing levels by overexpression of SPP1 inhibits transactivation,64 while decreasing S1P degradation by inhibition of SPL promotes it.65 Such inside-out transactivation loops may be a general phenomenon, as chemotactic signals for neutrophils acting through their receptors induce secretion of ATP that then locally activates cell surface nucleotide receptors to coordinate directed cell migration.66
SIP1
S1P1 is ubiquitously expressed, with high levels in brain, lung, spleen, cardiovascular system and kidney. It was originally identified as an orphan GPCR involved in differentiation of endothelial cells.67 Since its discovery, many of the important physiological functions of S1P have been attributed to ligation of this receptor. It is now known that S1P1 plays a key role in angiogenesis, because its deletion in mice is embryonic lethal due to hemorrhage resulting from incomplete vascular maturation as smooth muscle cells and pericytes fail to migrate and envelop nascent endothelial tubes.68 Endothelial cell conditional S1Pj knockout mice have been generated using the Cre/Lox system and these mice display the same vascular deficiencies, suggesting that S1Pj receptors on endothelial cells are also responsible for vessel coverage by smooth muscle cells.69 S1Pj also plays an important role in maintenance of endothelial and epithelial barrier integrity by functioning in conjunction with S1P2 and S1P3 to increase vascular integrity.70-72 Disruption of endothelial barriers leads to increased vascular permeability, often found in tumors and in inflammation. Silencing of S1Pj expression with siRNA blocks barrier enhancement, determined by transend-othelial monolayer electrical resistance, while silencing of S1P3 inhibits vascular disruption.71 These experiments also identified the downstream signaling molecules Akt and Rac as effectors of S1P1 actions on vascular integrity.71 A role for S1Pj in vascular integrity has also been demonstrated in vivo73-76 and experiments using a S1Pj selective antagonist demonstrated that S1Pj is crucial in maintaining vascular tone.77 Of particular interest are the conditional SphK1/SphK2 double knockout mice, which have normal vascular integrity despite having over 100-fold lower plasma S1P levels than wild type mice,78 suggesting that even a very low level of S1P is sufficient as long as S1Pj expression is normal.
S1Pj is also intimately involved in immune cell function. In particular, its expression is required for lymphocyte egress from lymph nodes. Resting T- and B-cells express primarily S1Pj and its downregulation or deletion results in lymphopenia due to the inability oflymphocytes to exit from the lymph nodes.15,79 Additionally, transplantation ofS1Pj deficient thymocytes and lymphocytes into normal mice results in their sequestration in lymph nodes and Peyer’s patches. Moreover, T-cells overexpressing S1Pj preferentially distribute into blood.80 These results confirm that S1P1 controls lymphocyte recirculation.
SIP2
S1P2 is also widely expressed in a variety of different cell types. Unlike S1Pj knockout mice, newborn S1P2 deficient mice do not demonstrate any striking abnormalities, although they have been reported to develop sporadic seizures between 3-7 weeks of age.81 Neocortical pyramidal cells from these mice also display an increase in excitability.81 In addition, S1P2~’~ mice are deaf indicating that S1P2 is required for proper development of the auditory and vestibular systems.82,83 S1P2 is also required for proper degranulation of mast cells.57 S1P2 is generally considered to be a repellant receptor as its activation inhibits cell migration and appears to work in opposition to S1Pj and S1P3, which both enhance cell migration.84 Similarly, activation of S1P2 activates ROCK/Rho and leads to increases in vascular permeability.72 Finally, although the visceral organs of S1P2~’~ mice develop normally, expression of S1P2 promotes liver tissue remodeling in response to acute injury.85
S1P3
Much like the lack of phenotypic effects of deletion of S1P2, deletion of S1P3 in mice does not generate any obvious phenotype. S1P3 is expressed in the cardiovascular system, lungs, kidney, intestines, spleen and cartilage.86 Knockouts of both S1P2 and S1P3 increases perinatal lethality, but not to a great extent.87 However, the triple knockout of S1P1-3 leads to embryonic lethality due to massive vascular deficiencies perhaps even worse than those resulting from knockout of S1Pj alone.88 S1P3 is also an important regulator of vascular permeability signaling through the downstream effectors ROCK and Rho.72 A clear role for S1P3 has also been demonstrated in the regulation of heart rate,89 as S1P3 expression is localized to myocytes and perivascular smooth muscle cells and its activation results in bradycardia and hypertension.
SIP4 and S1P5
S1P4-5 have much narrower patterns of expression than the dominant S1P1-3 receptors, localizing in human leukocytes, NK cells, airway smooth muscle cells and white matter of CNS tracts.90-93 S1P4 is primarily expressed in lymphoid tissues, including the thymus, spleen, bone marrow, topic and peripheral leukocytes.94 S1P4 directly couples to Gai and Ga12/13 subunits of trimeric G proteins and Jurkat cells over expressing S1P4 display enhanced pertussis toxin-sensitive cell motility in the absence of S1P.95 S1P4 stimulation also activates the mitogen activated-protein kinases ERK1/2, activates phospholipase C and modulates the opening of intracellular calcium stores.96,97 Stimulation of S1P4 ectopically expressed on CHO-K1 cells induced cytoskeletal rearrangements and cell rounding, as well as its internalization following S1P stimulation.95 Whether or not S1P4 has a role in cell motility remains unclear. In D10G4.1 mouse Th2 cells and EL4.IL-2 mouse T-cells lacking endogenous S1P receptors but transfected with S1P4, its activation failed to transduce chemotactic responses.98 These cells also displayed enhanced secretion of IL-10 and decreased proliferation in response to S1P.98
S1P5 is highly expressed in oligodendrocytes;92 however, silencing of S1P5 expression does not inhibit myelination or produce any other obvious phenotype in these cells.99 Binding of S1P to S1P5 induces phosphatase-dependent inhibition of ERK1/2, resulting in an antiproliferative phenotype.91,100,101 In addition, stimulation of rat oligodendrocytes with PDGF increases S1P1 expression with a concomitant downregulation of S1P5, resulting in an amplified mitogenic response.102 A recent report demonstrated that S1P5 is present in natural killer cells (NK). Mice deficient in S1P5 display aberrant NK cell homing and mobilization of NK cells to inflamed organs.93 Finally, despite a multitude of studies focusing on physiological functions of S1PRs, some actions of S1P resulting from activation of SphKs are independent of S1PRs.
Evidence for Intracellular Targets of S1P
As discussed above, cellular levels of S1P are controlled both by its synthesis and by its degradation. S1P can be degraded either by dephosphorylation back to sphingosine or irreversibly degraded by SPL to ethanolamine phosphate and fatty aldehyde. In fact, the latter is the only pathway in eukaryotic cells for degradation of sphingoid bases. Thus, S1P formation and subsequent degradation by SPL is one means for decreasing sphingolipid levels within the cell. Intriguingly, S1P is also an intermediate in the formation of sphingolipids from salvaged sphingoid bases. Though these pathways regulating sphingolipid levels demonstrate a central role for S1P, emerging evidence from yeast, plants and mammals points to S1P as a classical, intracellular second messenger.
S1P in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
The yeast genome does not encode a recognizable cell surface receptor for S1P and exogenous S1P does not affect yeast growth.103 Thus, any role for S1P in yeast physiology must therefore be intracellular. While no direct target for S1P has been found, S1P does indeed have intracellular functions in yeast. First, it has been demonstrated that yeast cells deleted ofS1P phosphatase (lcb3/ ysr2/lbp1) and SPL (dpll) accumulate large amounts of S1P and are nonviable or very slow growing. This growth arrest can be can be rescued if the major yeast SphK (lcb4) is deleted, indicating that intracellular S1P suppresses yeast cell growth.104,105 Indeed, sphingosine itself induces growth arrest in yeast and this effect can be blocked by mutational inactivation of SphK.103 The growth inhibition may be due to elevated levels cytosolic calcium, as S1P has been shown to increase intracellular calcium levels.106 In contrast, while heat shock-induced cell cycle arrest is mediated by the sphingoid base itself107 heat shock also increases SphK activity103 and S1P accumulation,108 suggesting a functional role for S1P in heat shock responses. Preventing S1P metabolism by deletion of either the S1P phosphatase Lcb3p109,110 or SPL108 led to enhanced levels of S1P and increased heat shock tolerance. Moreover, mutational inactivation of SphK reversed the protective effect of SPL deletion.103 That deletion of either an S1P phosphatase or SPL promotes heat tolerance indicates that S1P has direct actions, rather than merely functioning as a metabolic intermediate. Identification of molecular targets of S1P in yeast would aid this quest in mammalian cells.
S1P in Arabidopsis thaliana
Abscisic acid is a plant hormone responsible for mediating responses to drought conditions such as closure of stomata to prevent water loss. It was recently demonstrated that drought increased S1P levels in plants and that abscisic acid-induced stomatal closure was reduced by SphK inhibitors. 111 Subsequently, it was shown that abscisic acid activated SphK in Arabidopsis.112 Intriguingly, these authors showed that the effects of S1P on stomatal openings were dependent on the single canonical Ga protein in plants, GPA1. This finding suggests that S1P might be acting through plant GPCRs. However, Arabidopsis has only one GPCR-like protein, designated GCR1, which is not homologous to the known S1PRs, does not bind phosphorylated sphingoid bases and G CR1 mutants are hypersensitive to S1P-induced stomatal closure.113 Thus, S1P likely regulates stomatal apertures and drought responses intracellularly in plants.
S1P in Mammalian Cells
The observation that expression of SphK1, but not SphK2, decreases ceramide levels and increases dihydrosphingosine levels47 suggests that S1P produced by SphK1 may negatively regulate one or more ofthe six (dihydro)ceramide synthases (CerS), leading to accumulation of its substrate, dihydrosphingosine. Subsequently, using lysates from cells over-expressing individual CerSs, S1P was shown to be a noncompetitive in vitro inhibitor of CerS2, but not of other CerSs.48 In silico analysis identified two domains in CerS2 with predicted homology to S1PRs and mutation of one arginine to alanine in each of these two domains removed S1P inhibition without altering CerS activity.48 The authors concluded that S1P directly binds to and inhibits, CerS2. However, it is also possible that S1P acts through intermediate proteins in cell lysates to inhibit CerS2. Moreover, CerS2 does not use C16 or C18 acyl CoAs as substrates, yet it is C16 and C18 ceramides that are most affected by expression of SphK1.47 Additionally, S1P produced by SphK1 reverses CerS1-induced chemosensitivity, suggesting that S1P directly affects CerS1.40 Finally, it is not yet clear whether inhibition of CerS2 by S1P is a signal-mediated effect or whether it is simply feedback product inhibition. Further work is needed to confirm that S1P binds to and inhibits CerS2.
As mentioned previously, autocrine and/or paracrine transactivation of S1PRs is typically accompanied by translocation of SphK1 to the plasma membrane. However, both SphK1 and SphK2 have been shown to translocate to other cellular compartments, suggesting that S1P may be produced locally in these compartments to act on specific intracellular targets. For example, SphK1 is targeted to internal membranes through interaction with RPK11824 and Acy1.26 SphK1 translocated to nascent phagosomes promotes maturation into mature phagolysosomes.114 SphK 1 has also been shown to translocate to the nuclear envelope during S-phase115 and this translocation may play a role in the ability of SphK1 overexpression to promote the G1/S transition.116 Conversely, SphK2 has been shown to reside in the nucleoplasm in certain cells, where it functions to arrest cells in G1.30,39 Moreover, SphK2 has a nuclear export signal sequence that is activated by phorbol ester-induced phosphorylation, likely through protein kinase D.117 Whether the nuclear export signal serves to promote SphK2/S1P signaling in the cytosol or to decrease SphK2/S1P signaling in the nucleus is unclear. In some cells, SphK2 has been shown to translocate to the ER under stress conditions and promote apoptosis.47 Indeed, targeting SphK1 to the ER induced apoptosis,34 suggesting that S1P produced at the ER has specific targets.
A direct target for S1P in the ER has not conclusively been identified, although strong evidence indicates that S1P can activate thapsigargin-sensitive calcium channels, likely in the ER. S1P induced inositol trisphosphate receptor-independent release of calcium from permeablized cells118 and from cell fractions rich in rough, but not smooth, ER.119 Consistent with these results, cells overexpressing SphK2, which localizes in part to the ER, were also shown to have elevated intracellular calcium.47 Conversely, fetal liver derived-mast cells from Sphk2r^ mice have a defect in calcium mobilization in response to IgE receptor crosslinking that cannot be restored with exogenous S1P,58 again suggesting an internal S1P target. Exogenous S1P increases calcium in HEK293 cells, a response that can be inhibited with pertussis toxin. However, microinjection of S1P increases calcium bypassing a pertussis toxin block, again supporting a role for intracellular S1P in calcium release.120 Similarly, caged S1P can elicit calcium mobilization in cells that do not respond to exogenous S1P.121 Likewise, UTP stimulates calcium mobilization in a SphK-dependent manner, but this effect is not mimicked by exogenous S1P.122 Finally, exogenous S1P itself can stimulate SphK and SphK inhibitors reduced calcium release induced by S1P.123 Intracellular calcium release by S1P may be an evolutionarily ancient pathway, as it has been shown that S1P can increase calcium in yeast.106 In sum, these results strongly suggest that S1P is a second messenger that can activate calcium channels.
Finally, there are other effects of S1P that cannot be explained by activation of the known S1PRs. For example, overexpression of SphK1 promotes survival of endothelial cells in part through PECAM-1 expression and activation ofAkt, an effect that is not reproduced by exogenous S1P.124 Dihydro-S1P and S1P bind and activate S1PRs with similar affinities, but dihydro-S1P cannot recapitulate all of the effects of S1P.125-128 For example, S1P, but not dihydro-S1P, protects male germ cells from apoptosis, an effect that was linked to inhibition of NF-kB and activation of Akt.128 A similar protection pattern was observed for HL-60 and PC-12 cells.125 Conversely, S1P-phosphonate, which does not bind to S1PRs, also protects these cells from apoptosis,125 suggesting an intracellular action. Other studies using embryonic fibroblasts from S1PR knockout mice ruled out S1PR involvement, demonstrating that SphK1 overexpression stimulated growth and survival in wild type and in S1PR negative cells.129 In the APOmin/+ model of intestinal tum-origenesis, it was shown that Sphk1~!~ mice, but not S1pf /+, S1p2~’~, or mice, had reduced tumor progression and size,130 suggesting an intracellular role for S1P. Moreover, SphK1 null mice had elevated levels of sphingosine but not S1P, so it is possible that reduced tumor progression and size was due to inhibitory effects of sphingosine rather than to the absence of S1P stimulation. S1PR knockouts were similarly used to demonstrate that SphK2-induced apoptosis was S1PR independent.34 Consistent with a role for SphK2 in apoptosis, the FTY720 analog AAL(R), which is phosphorylated by SphK2 but only poorly by SphK1, induces apoptosis in Jurkat cells and primary splenocytes.131 The authors showed that AAL(R) had to be phosphorylated to affect cells as the nonphosphorylated AAL(R) isomer did not induce apoptosis in cells from Sphk2rh mice. However, exogenous addition of phosphorylated AAL(R) did not induce apoptosis, suggesting both that phospho-AAL(R) must be generated at or near its site of action and that S1PRs are not involved in SphK2-induced apoptosis.
Intracellular S1P has also been linked to regulation of inflammatory responses. CD4+ T-cells from SphK2 knockout mice displayed a hyperactivated phenotype, increased proliferation and enhanced secretion of cytokines and STAT5 activation in response to IL-2.132 This phenotype was physiologically relevant, as T-cells from SphK2 knockout mice induced a much more rapid response than T-cells from wild type littermates in an adoptive transfer model of inflammatory bowel disease. The hyperresponsiveness to IL-2 could not be reversed with exogenous S1P, indicating that internal S1P normally suppresses IL-2-induced inflammatory responses. Interestingly, activation of the T-cell receptor in Th1 and Th2 cells leads to increased expression of SphK1, but not SphK2 and SphK1 negatively regulates chemokine expression, although the authors did not examine whether exogenous S1P reproduced chemokine suppression.133 Similarly, it has been shown that in primary umbilical vein endothelial cells, the pro-inflammatory cytokine TNFa greatly increased expression of the S1P phosphatase SPP2.134 Induction of SPP2 was required for the TNFa-induced production of IL-1P and IL-8. SPP2 is an integral membrane protein of the ER and its requirement for induction of inflammatory responses suggests that it acts at the ER to remove an inhibitory S1P signal. Moreover, downregulation of SPP1 demonstrated that it played no role in TNFa-induced cytokine secretion. As SPP1 is also an ER resident protein, these results suggest a role for S1P at a specific subcompartment of the ER. Moreover, parallel findings have been reported in yeast, where the S1P-specific phosphatases, YSR2 and YSR3, are both localized to the ER and have overlapping but distinct functions.5
Many studies have utilized nonisozyme specific SphK inhibitors to implicate S1P in various signaling pathways (e.g., refs. 135,136), leading to the conclusion that S1P was acting intracellularly in these systems, but S1P release was not detected. Still, care should be used in interpreting these results as S1P release may have been below the limits of detection. Moreover, exogenous S1P can activate all surface S1PRs, perhaps resulting in net opposing effects. It is also possible that signaling events localize secretion of S1P to regions of the plasma membrane where specific receptors to be activated are localized. Thus, lack of detectable S1P secretion does not definitively show that S1PRs are not involved in a particular signaling pathway.
Furthermore, studies in endothelial cells using a pan sphingosine kinase inhibitor demonstrated that endogenously generated S1P functions as a positive modulator of calcium entry via store operated channels (SOC), whereas exogenously administered S1P initiated calcium release from the ER similar to histamine and decreased endothelial cell permeability.137 These results suggest that the production of intracellular S1P and not the secretion ofS1P to act on other immunoregulatory cells, is the primary determinant of the inflammatory response.
Recently, a new study demonstrated that the vascular permeability inhibitor Ang-1 stimulated SphK1 and led to increases in intracellular S1P and decreases in vascular permeability. This function remained undisturbed even when expression of S1P1-3 was downregulated.138 Exogenous S1P also decreased vascular permeability, but not in cells where S1PRs were downregulated.138 These results suggest that Ang-1/SphK1 actions on vascular permeability are mediated via an intracel-lular mechanism.
Implications, Future Directions, and Conclusion
It is now clear that the bioactive lipid mediator S1P exerts effects both intracellularly and extracellularly. In addition, SphK1 and SphK2 are not only distributed differently throughout tissues and within cells, S1P produced by these kinases can have different, sometimes opposite, downstream effects. How can one simple molecule like S1P have such a wide range of effects ? It seems that in the case of S1P, the location of its production may be a major determinant of the resulting phenotype. The key to unlocking this riddle will be the inevitable discovery of intracellular S1P binding partners, but to date, none have been unequivocally identified. Extensive studies of proteins in the nucleus, particularly those involved in the transcriptional machinery and the regulation of the cell cycle, are clearly indicated to elucidate the mechanism by which S1P exerts its effects there. Additionally, the consequences of activation or inhibition SphK1 vs. SphK2 must be studied with more scrutiny, as it is apparent that despite catalyzing the same reaction, they have different functions. In addition, because the intracellular actions of S1P involve many functions related to cancer and other diseases, a full understanding of both the extracellular and intracellular actions of S1P will be needed to best design clinical therapies targeting SphKs and S1P production as well as its receptors.
