Derivation of the Airy Summation for a Fabry-Perot Interferometer (Zodiacal Dust Cloud)

The diagram shows two rays emerging from the Fabry-Perot, one of which, To, passes through the etalon without reflections, and the other, T[, is reflected twice by the coatings, before emerging. The refractive index of the medium between the plates is n, and that of the medium outside the gap is no. In our case the medium outside the gap is the material of the plates themselves, quartz, and the emerging rays have to pass through another refraction before they finally leave the etalon, but the pattern of the resulting transmission is unaffected by this, so it is ignored in this analysis.

tmp69-338

At each reflection, the amplitude is reduced bytmp69-339and the phase is shifted bytmp69-340while at each transmission through an interface the amplitude is reduced bytmp69-341Assuming no absorption, we have, by the law of conservation of energy, T + R = 1.


Using complex form for a light ray, and defining the amplitude of the wave at point (a) as unity, the amplitude at point (b) is

tmp69-342tmp69-343tmp69-344tmp69-345

where k is the wave number inside the etalon, given bytmp69-346is the vacuum wavelength.

At point (c) the amplitude is

tmp69-348

The total amplitude of the two beams will be the sum of their amplitudes, measured at a wave front defined by a line perpendicular to the direction of the beam. We therefore need to add, to the amplitude at point (b), a modified amplitude, equal in magnitude to Ti, but retarded in phase by an amounttmp69-349 wheretmp69-350is the wave number outside of the etalon, given bytmp69-351Thus

tmp69-355

where lo is given by

tmp69-356

Neglecting thetmp69-357phase change due to the two reflections, we have for the phase difference between the two beams

tmp69-359

From the law of refraction

tmp69-360

So the phase difference may be written

tmp69-361

To within a constant beam can be written as multiplicative phase factor, the amplitude of the m emergent

tmp69-362

The total transmitted beam is the sum of all individual beams

tmp69-363

This is the sum of a geometric series, and so can be written as

tmp69-364

The intensity of the beam is nowtmp69-365and, since the incident beam was assumed to have an intensity of unity, this will also give the transmission function:

tmp69-367

This completes the derivation of equation 2.1.

Next post:

Previous post: