Global Positioning System Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 6.
Results about similarity methods by changing occurrences of attributes.
Correlation
Att.
Lin
Dice
MDSM
v
MDSM
c
GSim
v
GSim
c
15
0.7127
-0.1539
0.1495
0.2290
0.3335
0.7191
17
0.7127
-0.1021
0.1836
0.2361
0.3902
0.7248
19
0.7127
0.0332
0.2570
0.2640
0.5708
0.7751
21
0.7127
0.1337
0.2984
0.2865
0.6067
0.7772
23
0.7127
0.1855
0.3351
0.3103
0.6503
0.7903
25
0.7127
0.2972
0.3774
0.3419
0.7214
0.8198
27
0.7127
0.5034
0.5041
0.4532
0.7748
0.8310
29
0.7127
0.5705
0.5490
0.5052
0.7997
0.8340
31
0.7127
0.5840
0.5422
0.5125
0.8148
0.8342
33
0.7127
0.6132
0.5413
0.5260
0.8242
0.8343
35
0.7127
0.6135
0.5446
0.5430
0.8332
0.8345
1
Lin
Dice
MDSM
v
MDSM
c
GSim
v
GSim
c
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
-0.2
15
19
23
27
31
35
Attributes
Fig. 10.
Correlation of methods by varying occurrence of attributes.
Color image of this figure appears in the color plate section at the end of the topic.
MDSM
v
,
MDSM
c
. Considering that both
Dice
and
MSDM
are feature-based
approaches, the
Dice
method achieves better correlation than
MDSM
by
increasing the number of shared features. However, their correlations are
lower than the correlations obtained by
GSim
method. Since
Lin
method
Search WWH ::
Custom Search