Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
25
25
MMS(K=2)
sMDIST(K=2)
Random(K=2)
GMMS(K=2)
sMDIST(K=2)
Random(K=2)
20
20
15
15
10
10
5
5
0
0
-2
-1
0
1
-2
-1
0
1
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
False Accept Rate (%)
False Accept Rate (%)
Fig. 3. ROC curves show comparison between
MMS , sMDIST and Random when K=2
Fig. 4. ROC curves show comparison be-
tween GMMS, sMDIST and Random when
K=2
20
20
MMS(K=3)
sMDIST(K=3)
Random(K=3)
GMMS(K=3)
sMDIST(K=3)
Random(K=3)
18
18
16
16
14
14
12
12
10
10
8
8
6
6
4
4
2
2
0
0
-2
-1
0
1
-2
-1
0
1
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
False Accept Rate (%)
False Accept Rate (%)
Fig. 5. ROC curves show comparison between
MMS , sMDIST and Random when K=3
Fig. 6. ROC curves show comparison be-
tween GMMS, sMDIST and Random when
K=3
20
20
MMS(K=4)
sMDIST(K=4)
Random(K=4)
GMMS(K=4)
sMDIST(K=4)
Random(K=4)
18
18
16
16
14
14
12
12
10
10
8
8
6
6
4
4
2
2
0
0
10 -2
10 -1
10 0
10 1
10 -2
10 -1
10 0
10 1
False Accept Rate (%)
False Accept Rate (%)
Fig. 7. ROC curves show comparison between
MMS , sMDIST and Random when K=4
Fig. 8. ROC curves show comparison be-
tween GMMS, sMDIST and Random when
K=4
Previous Page
Next Page
Advances in Computational Science and Engineering
Search WWH ::




Custom Search
Home