Two Frequency Receivers (GPS)

A major reason for the design of multi-frequency receivers is to allow estimation and compensation of the ionospheric delay.

Simultaneous L1 and L2 pseudorange observables from the same satellite and receiver can be modeled as

tmp18385_thumb

wheretmp18386_thumbis the lumped common mode errors other that the ionospheric delaytmp18387_thumbrepresents the sum of the receiver noise and multipath errors, andtmp18388_thumbandtmp18389_thumbare the carrier frequencies. In the analysis to follow, we will assume thattmp18390_thumbare independent, Gaussian random variables with variancetmp18391_thumb


Eqns. (8.83-8.84) can be manipulated to provide an ionospheric free pseudorange observable as

tmp18398_thumb

which has the measurement model

tmp18399_thumb

Eqn. (8.85) is not usually used directly, because as shown in eqn.(8.86), the noise variance (i.e., effect oftmp18400_thumbis approximatelytmp18401_thumbThe following two paragraphs discuss alternative approaches to the construction of ionospheric free pseudorange observables.

An estimate of the ionospheric delay can be computed as

tmp18404_thumb

Direct substitution of eqns. (8.83-8.84) into eqn. (8.87) shows that

tmp18405_thumb

which shows thattmp18406_thumbis unbiased. The variance oftmp18407_thumbat each epoch is approximatelytmp18408_thumbBecause of the magnification of the receiver noise, the ionospheric estimate of eqn. (8.87) is not used directly to compensate the pseudorange measurement. Instead, becausetmp18409_thumbchanges slowly with a correlationtime of a few hours, whiletmp18410_thumbhave much shorter correlation times,tmp18411_thumbcould for example be low pass filtered by a filter with a time constant of several minutes to greatly decrease the effect oftmp18412_thumbwhile maintaining the time variation oftmp18413_thumbIf we denote the filtered version of tmp18414_thumbthen an ionosphere free pseudorange can be computed as tmp18424_thumb

which has the error model

tmp18425_thumb

where the ionospheric error has been (essentially) removed and the measurement noise has not been amplified. The remaining common-mode errors could be removed via differential processing. Another approach is discussed subsequently.

Simultaneous L1 and L2 phase observables from the same satellite and receiver can be modeled as

tmp18426_thumb

wheretmp18427_thumbare the wavelength of the L1 and L2 carrier signals, respectively, andtmp18428_thumbis the combined effect of multipath and receiver noise. The subsequent analysis assumes that /tmp18429_thumbare independent Gaussian processes with variancetmp18430_thumbUsing the phase observables, the ionospheric delay can be estimated as

tmp18435_thumb

Direct substitution of eqns. (8.91) and (8.92) into eqn. (8.93) shows that

tmp18436_thumb

Therefore, the variance oftmp18437_thumbat each epoch is approximatelytmp18438_thumbhowever, the estimate contains the significant constant bias

tmp18441_thumb

Eqns. (8.89) and (8.95) have the form

tmp18442_thumb

Eqns. (8.96) and (8.97) are in the exact form considered in Example 5.4. Therefore, the solution is

tmp18443_thumb

where

tmp18444_thumb

starting at k =1 with .tmp18445_thumbThe estimation error variance fortmp18446_thumbis

tmp18447_thumband fortmp18448_thumbwheretmp18449_thumbandtmp18450_thumbis the ratio of the phase noise to the pseudorange noise.

The desire to estimate the ionospheric delay was a primary motivation for the GPS system to incorporate signals on two frequencies. The specification of the two frequencies involved a tradeoff related to the frequency spacing. If the frequency separation was too small, then measurement errors would be significantly magnified as shown in eqn. (8.88) and (8.94). However, if the frequency separation were too large, then separate antennas would be required to receive the two signals.

Wide and Narrow Lane Observables

This section develops the equations for the narrow-lane and wide-lane observables. These variables are synthesized as linear combinations of the L1 and L2 measurements. The interest in the wide-lane signal is that its wavelength is large enough that the wide-lane variable is often used to facilitate the problem of integer ambiguity resolution, see Section 8.9.

The phase measurements of eqns. (8.91-8.92) can be modeled as

tmp18457_thumb

Forming the sum and difference of eqns. (8.99) and (8.100) results in

tmp18458_thumb

By defining the wide and narrow lane wavelengths as

tmp18459_thumb

eqns. (8.101) and (8.102) can be written in meters as

tmp18460_thumb

wheretmp18461_thumbtherefore, the standard deviation of the widelane noisetmp18462_thumbis approximately 5.7 times the standard deviation of the L1 or L2 phase noisetmp18463_thumbThe fact that the wide-lane phase has a wavelength of approximately 86cm can simplify integer ambiguity resolution in differential GPS applications. The pseudorange estimates can be processed similarly yielding

tmp18467_thumb

Both the code and phase narrow-lane observables have noise reduced bytmp18468_thumb

Next post:

Previous post: