Depositional dynamics and sequence development in a tidally influenced marginal marine basin: Early Jurassic Neill Klinter Group, Jameson Land Basin, East Greenland - From Depositional Systems to Sedimentary Successions on the Norwegian Continental Margin - page 310

i ii iii gravel

gravel

Shell fragment

burrows (shell?)

Ammonite imprints

Shell fragments

Shell fragments

FA 4b/section 8 FA 4b/section 13

5cm 5cm 1cm FA 4b/section 8

Locality S3 Locality S5

* m/t Marine and terrestrial palynomorphs
* t/m Terrestrial and marine palynomorphs
* t Terrestrial palynomorphs

AU AE section 8 section 12 section 13

section 14

* m/t

30 30

FSb

20

40

Sandstone Siltstone Mudstone Sill

MRS1

20

20

Locality S5
section 15

Locality S6
section 16

Locality S7
section c

10

30

* t/m

MFS1

10

10

10

0m 260 10

FSa

20

* t

0m

0m 0m

250 0m

Sand

Silt Sand

Sand

10

Sand

Clay Silt Gr. Pbl. Clay Pbl. Clay Silt Gr. Pbl.

Gr.

Clay Silt Gr. Pbl.

Sand

Clay Silt Gr. Pbl.

Sand

Clay Silt Gr. Pbl.

0m

Silt Sand Clay Gr. Pbl.

(B)

Locality N2 Locality N3 Locality N4 Locality N4

AU AE section 19 section 28

section 30 section 30

20

20 70

MRS 1

10

10 60

MF S1 & FSa

* t

0m

0m 50

Sand

Clay Gr. Pbl.

Silt

Sand

Clay Gr. Pbl.

Silt

TS1

40

30m

Mudstone Siltstone Sandstone

Sand

Clay Gr. Pbl.

Silt

* t Terrestrial palynomorphs

Fig. 8. (A) Selected detailed sedimentary logs show the correlatable poorly sorted and upward-fining facies character
of the SHFS architectural element and the AU1 in the southern study area. The overlying TDDF and TDDP elements show
upward coarsening facies trends and belong to the AU2. Photos of SHFS sandstone lithofacies show; i) diverse marine