Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
and reported estimation of parameters under Kibedani geyser based on
comparison between results of simulation of this combined model and those
of observation of Kibedani geyser.
In the case of using only the modified dynamical model, we can select
many groups of parameters suitable for results of observation. But, in the
case of using the combined model, the number of groups of parameters suit-
able for results of observation is strictly limited because of demands from
two independent models, that is, the mathematical model and the modified
dynamical model. In this sense, the estimation of parameters through the
combined model make more reliable one.
Acknowledgments
Results of observation of Kibedani geyser were offered by Maeda laboratory
at Kanto-Gakuin university. The author would like to thank Prof. Naoki
Maeda, Mr. Eiichi Ishii, and members of Maeda laboratory.
References
1. M. Katase
et al.
, Abstracts of a meeting for presenting research papers of
Kanto Gakuin University College of Engineering, 1999, pp. 99-100.
2. H. Kagami, Abstracts of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Balneological Society
of Japan 33 (2002).
3. H. Kagami, The 2003 IUGG General Assembly, HW04/09P/C31-004 (2003).
4. H. Kagami,
Proceedings of the 38th Conference of Sciete Internationale des
Techniques Hydrothermales and the 56th Annual Meeting of the Balneological
Society of Japan
(2003), pp. 55-60.
5. E. Ishii
et al.
, Abstracts of the 52th Annual Meeting of the Balneological
Society of Japan 28 (1999).
6. H. Kagami, Abstract of Papers Submitted to the 56th Annual Meeting, Jour-
nal of the Balneological Society of Japan
, 95 (2003).
7. H. Kagami, Abstracts 2004 Japan Earth and Planetary Science Joint Meeting,
H020-001 (2004).
8. H. Kagami, Abstracts of the 53th Annual Meeting of the Balneological Society
of Japan
27
(2000).
9. http://home.kanto-gakuin.ac.jp/
∼
kg044001/yano/sub5.shtml
53
