Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
or
N ≈ ( z 1 + z 2 + . . . + z n ) + N (1 − p ) n .
Solving this equation for N , we have a model for the relationship between N ,
total catch, and p , which is
N ≈ ( z 1 + z 2 + . . . + z n )/{1 − (1 − p ) n }.
(5.1)
Continuing the numerical example and assuming the total catch is 67,
Equation (5.1) yields the result that
N ≈ (67)/{1 − (0.8) 5 )} = 99.7.
Hence, with real-life data Equation (5.1) gives an estimate of N .
The expected catch in the i ith sample is z i = N (1 − p ) i -1 p . Taking the loga-
rithm of both sides of this equation yields the approximate linear relationship
log e ( z i ) ≈ log e ( N ) + log e ( p ) + ( i − 1) log e (1 − p ),
or
log e ( z i ) ≈ a + ( i − 1) b ,
so that
y i a + bx i ,
(5.2)
where y i = log e ( z i ), x i = i − 1, and the slope of the line is b = log e (1 − p ). This
equation therefore gives a model for the natural logarithm of the number
removed in the i ith sample.
On the basis of Equations (5.1) and (5.2), Soms (1985) proposed the fol-
lowing method for estimating N and p . First, the values y i = log e ( z i ) and
x i = i − 1 are calculated for each of the sample, i = 1, 2, . . . , n . Next, the equa-
tion y i = a + bx i is fitted by ordinary linear regression methods to obtain
an estimate of the slope b . Then, because b in the regression equation is
b = log e (1 − p ) in Equation (5.2), an estimate of p can be found by solving the
equation
log(1 ˆ )
e
pb
to give
ˆ 1exp() .
p
=−
b
(5.3)
Finally, Equation (5.1) suggests the estimator
{
}
ˆ
ˆ )
n
Nzz
=+++
(
z
)/1 (1
−−
p
,
2
1
n
Search WWH ::




Custom Search