Global Positioning System Reference
In-Depth Information
false alarm,
P
fa
, as was described for the Tong detector. Note that the
M
of
N
algo-
rithm in Figure 5.39 contains a superior reference noise source technique compared
to that of the Tong algorithm in Figure 5.37. This requires a preplanned receiver
design that provides the same PRN code for each channel that is not used by (does
not correlate with) any SV in the constellation—such as G1(t) for C/A code and PRN
38 for P(Y) code—and one component of a spare complex correlator (shown as
Q
N
component in Figure 5.39).
The overall probability of false alarm in
N
trials is [17]:
N
n
N
n
N
M
−
1
(
(
)
Nn
−
)
Nn
−
∑
∑
n
n
P
=
P
1
−
P
=
1
−
P
1
−
P
FA
fa
fa
fa
fa
(5.48)
nM
=
n
=
0
(
)
=−
1
BM
−
1;
NP
,
fa
where
B
(
k;N,p
) is the cumulative pdf.
The overall probability of detection in
N
trials is [17]:
N
n
N
(
)
Nn
−
(
)
=
∑
n
P
=
P
1
−
P
=
1
−
BMNP
−
1;
,
(5.49)
D
d
d
d
nM
Figure 5.40 illustrates the
M
of
N
probability of detection versus
C
/
N
into the
detector for
N
10
−6
. By inspection of Figure
=
8 and
M
=
3, 4, 5, and 6 when
P
FA
=
1
×
5.40, it is clear that
M
5 is the optimum value. The data were generated by com-
puting
P
fa
given
M
,
N,
and
P
FA
using the following equation [17]:
=
(
)
−
1
PBMNP
fa
=
−
11
;,
−
(5.50)
FA
100%
90%
80%
3of8
5 of 8 (Best)
70%
60%
4of8
50%
40%
6of8
30%
20%
10%
0%
8
12
6
10
0
2
4
−
C/N (dB) into envelope detector with P
= 10
FA
Figure 5.40
Probability of detection for
M
of
N
search detector.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search