Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Fig. 5.23). In contrast to the above-mentioned experiments, the method for Hg
0
adsorption by AC in simulated flue gas should cause Hg
0
to be first oxidized into
Hg
2+
by simulated flue gas components and then be adsorbed by AC.
5.4.4.2 Hg
0
Adsorption by AC(XK) that Previously Adsorbed Simulated Flue
Gas Components
During the experiment, the adsorption temperature was controlled at 130 °C, the
amount of AC(XK) was 0.0506 g, and the total flow of simulated flue gas was
maintained at 1.3 L/min, including the 6.9% O
2
, 282 ppm NO, 8.7% CO
2
, 1,786
ppm SO
2
, 23.4 ppm NO
2
components.
As shown in Fig. 5.25, AC(XK) was the first simulated flue gas component to
be adsorbed within about 1 h and was then switched to adsorbed Hg
0
in an N
2
at-
mosphere. As a result, AC(XK) obtained the capability to adsorb Hg
0
in an N
2
atmosphere, similar to AC(YK), AC(XK), and AC(MZ-T) (Fig. 5.23). This ex-
periment showed that the promotion of simulated flue gas components on Hg
0
adsorption by XK-AC materialized on the surface of AC.
g/
O
N m
3
P
.
A
x
is
C:
Axis
A
: % B:
pp
m
20
Bypass
Hg
0
adsoprption
14
Simulation of gas adsorption
18
1900
12
16
14
CO
2
(A: ppm)
O
2
(A: ppm)
NO (B: ppm)
NO
2
(B: ppm)
SO
2
(B: ppm)
Hg
0
(C:g/(N m
3
))
Hg
2+
(C: g/(N m
3
))
1520
10
12
8
1140
10
6
8
760
.
6
4
.
4
380
2
2
0
0
0
0:18:10 0:36:30 0:54:50 1:13:10 1:31:30 1:49:50 2:08:10 2:26:30 2:44:50 3:03:10 3:21:30 3:39:50
Time (h:m:s)
Fig. 5.25
Hg
0
absorption of AC(XK) after the simulation of flue gas in the N
2
environment
5.4.4.3 Influence of Simulated Flue Gas Components on Hg
0
Adsorption by
XK-AC
During the experiment, the adsorption temperature was controlled at 130 °C, the
amount of AC(XK) was 0.0505 g, and the total flow of simulated flue gas was
maintained at 1.3 L/min. The main concentrations of simulated flue gas components
at the outlet of the adsorption bed are shown in Fig. 5.26. The horizontal axis
showed experimental time in h:m:s. There were three ordinate axes, namely, A, B,
and C. Of these A showed O
2
and CO
2
concentrations in simulated flue gas as a
percentage; B showed the NO and NO
2
concentrations in simulated flue gas in ppm;
Search WWH ::
Custom Search