Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Fig. 5 Sections of DRG 2 weeks after direct injection or intrathecal delivery of AAV5-CMV-eGFP-WPRE. ( a , b )
Sections were processed for immunohistochemistry for eGFP ( green ) and
III-tubulin ( red ). ( a ) Example of a
section of a transduced DRG after direct injection. ( b ) Example of a section of a transduced DRG after intrathe-
cal injection. Bar = 100
ʲ
ʼ
m
Table 1
Comparison of direct injections to intrathecal injections using AAV
Direct injection
Intrathecal injection
Highly effi cient transduction of DRG
Effi cient transduction of DRG
Low virus quantity needed
High virus quantity needed
Local transduction of single DRG
Multiple DRG are targeted
Minimal leakage to adjacent tissues
Leakage of virus to the cord and periphery
Complex and time consuming procedure
Simple and fast procedure
High control of depth and location of needle
Poor control of direction of tubing
targeted delivery might be clinically more acceptable. Figure 5
shows an example of DRG that were transduced by direct or intra-
thecal injection using AAV5. See also Table 1 .
2.7 Conclusion
The emergence of AAV vectors for gene therapy applications makes
possible many experiments in the peripheral nervous system and
opens the road to clinical gene therapy applications which may be
developed directly from experimental settings. In this review we
hope to have presented clearly the methods by which AAV vectors
can be reliably delivered to primary sensory neurons in the dorsal
root ganglion.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for research funding provided by the
International Spinal Research Trust and the Dutch Organization
for Scientifi c Research (NWO).
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search