Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
predict the composition profi le in a one sided gradient as well as for semi-
symmetrically graded plate-shaped components [Put et al., 2003]. The prediction
of the concentration profi les are based on the description of the deposition yield
by means of the effective charge of the suspended powder particles, Q eff , the elec-
trophoretic mobility,
μ
, and the specifi c conductivity of the solvent,
σ
liq . Although
this model predicts the yield during EPD well, the parameters Q eff ,
σ
liq and
μ
are
fi tted parameters rather than real physical values.
If different powders i are present in the suspension, the deposition yield of
each powder on the deposition electrode can be described by [Biesheuvel and
Verweij, 1999 ]:
dy
dt
φ
φφ
i
di
=
ES f
μ
c
(10.1)
i
i
i
di
si
with dy
dt
i , the deposition rate of powder i on the electrode (g/s)
E , the electric fi eld strength (V/m)
μ
i , the electrophoretic mobility of powder i (m 2 /V.s)
c i , the concentration i of powder i in suspension (g/cm 3 )
f i , factor for powder i which takes in account that not all powder brought to
the electrode is incorporated in the deposit
S , the surface area of the deposition electrode (m 2 )
φ
di concentration (vol. %) of the powder in the deposit
φ
si concentration (vol. %) of the powder in the suspension
The concentration c i , t of powder i at time t is a function of the powder mass in
the suspension and the suspension volume at ( t
1) and the change in mass and
volume during
Δ
t :
t
MM dy
dt
i
+
Δ
dt
it
,
1
i
,
Δ
t
c
=
t
1
(10.2)
it
,
VV
+
Δ
t
1
Δ
t
1) (g)
With M i , t − 1 the mass of powder i in suspension at time ( t
Δ
M i, Δ t the change in mass of powder i by adding or removing suspen-
sions between ( t
1) and t (g)
V t − 1 the total volume suspension at time ( t
1) (cm 3 )
Δ
V Δ t change in suspension volume between ( t
1) and t ( s )
The total amount of powder deposited (
Δ
Y tot ) during
Δ
t is given by:
t
dy
dt
i
Δ
Y
=
dt
(10.3)
tot
i
t
1
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search