Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
(a)
(b)
F
F L
p m
F D
M
FIGURE 4.19 (a) Wind flow past a bluff body and (b) wind forces on a bluff body.
4.4.1 W IND F ORCES ON S TEEL R AILWAY B RIDGES
In contrast to long-span or flexible bridges (such as suspension or cable-stayed
bridges), ordinary steel railway bridges (such as those composed of beam, girder,
truss, and arch spans) need not consider aerodynamic effects of the wind in
design. However, the aerostatic effects of the wind on the superstructure and moving
train must be considered, particularly in regard to lateral bracing design.
A steady wind with uniform upstream velocity, V u , flowing past a bluff body (such
as the bridge cross section of Figure 4.19a) will create a maximum steady state local
or dynamic pressure, p m , in accordance with Bernoulli's fluid mechanics equation as
1
2 ρ
V u ,
p m =
p amb +
(4.34)
where p amb is the ambient air pressure and is equal to 0 at atmospheric pressure;
ρ
is
the air density; V u is the upstream air speed.
However, the average dynamic pressure on the bridge span will be less than
the maximum dynamic pressure given by Equation 4.34. Therefore, the dynamic
pressure, p , at any point on the bluff body can be expressed as
C p 2 ρ
V u ,
p
=
C p p m =
(4.35)
where C p is a dimensionless mean pressure coefficient that depends on the shape of
the obstruction.
For example, if we assume a 100 mph wind speed (which may occur during gale
and hurricane winds), Equation 4.34 yields a maximum dynamic pressure of 23.7 psf
(
0.0022 slug/ft 3 ).
Designwindforcesmustbebasedonaveragedynamicwindpressures(i.e.,reduced
by the use of an appropriate pressure coefficient) calculated over an appropriate cross-
sectionalarea.Thedesignmustalsoconsidertheeffectsofwindgusts. Itisbeneficial,
from a design perspective, to calculate design wind forces based on the maximum
dynamic pressure, a characteristic area, and a dimensionless coefficient that includes
ρ =
The effects from dynamic behavior and buffeting.
An equivalent static wind pressure is appropriate since the natural or fundamental frequency of the
superstructure is substantially greater than the frequency of localized gust effects.
Gust factors are generally between two and three for tall structures (Liu, 1991).
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search