Summary of studies used in the comparative assessments - Runoff Prediction in Ungauged Basins: Synthesis across Processes, Places and Scales - page 399

Table A7.2. Summary of information provided for the studies included in the Level 2 assessment, listing studies with more
detailed information about catchment characteristics and cross-validation performances

No. of
catchments Method Area (km 2 )

Elevation
(m) Study Region P A (mm) E PA (mm) T A ( C) Aridity ( − )

Viglione
et al.
( 2013b )

Austria 209 G, PB 13 - 7000 500 - 2300 280 - 800 0 - 10 180 - 2500 0.2 - 1.4

Narda ( 2012 ) Italy 23 IM 45 - 7000 600 - 1100 1670 - 2400

720 - 4100 700 - 900 630 - 660 6.8 - 7.8 0.7 - 0.9

Linhart et al.
( 2012 )

USA 6 PB

Sauquet and
Catalogne
( 2011 )

France 1080 R 1 - 110 000 600 - 2100 230 - 900 0.1 - 14.0 21 - 2980 0.2 - 1.3

Archfield
et al.
( 2010 )

USA 47 R 4 - 760 1100 - 1450 540 - 670 5.9 - 10.2 30 - 560 0.4 - 0.6

Ganora et al.
( 2009 )

Italy 36 IM 20 - 8000 840 - 1950 450 - 950 480 - 2700 0.4 - 1.0

Castellarin
et al.
( 2007 )

Italy 18 IM 60 - 1050 890 - 1300 670 - 750 11.3 - 13.4 380 - 1300 0.5 - 0.8

The catchment attributes and performance for a particular regionalisation method are available for each catchment and include area, mean
catchment elevation, mean annual precipitation (P A ), mean annual potential evaporation (E PA ) and mean annual air temperature (T A ).
Groups of regionalisationmethods: regressionmethods (R), indexmethods (IM), geostatistical methods (G) and process-based methods (PB).