Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Fig. 8.40
Critical stress on fibrous cap with respect to width of calcification gap and maximum
deformation on fibrous cap for two-dimensional plaque-rupture analysis. (
a
) of critical stress
σ
cr
versus width of calcification gap
d
cg
reflects the decrease in plaque vulnerability for increasing
occupancy of the calcification agglomerate (
which is inversely correlated to d
cg
). (
b
) Critical stress
σ
cr
versus maximum deformation
D
max
of fibrous cap for
d
fc
at 0.05 mm demonstrates that
σ
cr
becomes lower as
d
cg
minimizes the deformation
Fig. 8.41
Critical stress on fibrous cap with respect to width of calcification gap and maximum
deformation on fibrous cap for three-dimensional plaque rupture analysis. (
a
) critical stress
σ
cr
ver-
sus width of calcification gap
d
cg
shows that calcification gap value of > 0.21 mm causes stress lev-
els to exceed 300 kPa and cause plaque rupture. (
b
) Critical stress
σ
cr
versus maximum deformation
D
max
of fibrous cap for
d
fc
at 0.05 mm demonstrates that
D
max
> 0.168 mm causes plaque rupture
0.1 mm. Figure
8.41a
illustrates the relationship between calcification gap
d
cg
and
critical stress
σ
cr
, while Fig.
8.41b
correlates the critical stress
σ
cr
with maximum
fibrous cap deformation
D
max
. We note a slight reduction in critical stress below the
350 kPa threshold. The limiting calcification gap occurs at
d
cg
= 0.21 mm before
plaque rupture takes place for critical stress at 300 kPa. A larger calcification gap is
found (compared to the results of the two-dimensional model) occurring due to the
artery-plaque structure that is 2.775 times larger in size.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search