Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
44. Howard IP, Zacher JE, Allison RS (1998) Post-rotatory nystagmus and turning sensations
after active and passive turning. J Vestib Res 8(4):299-312
45. Ito H, Shibata I (2005) Self-motion perception from expanding and contracting optical flows
overlapped with binocular disparity. Vis Res 45(4):397-402. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.11.
009
46. Ji JTT, So RHY, Cheung RTF (2009) Isolating the effects of vection and optokinetic nystagmus
on optokinetic rotation-induced motion sickness. Hum Factors 51(5):739-751. doi: 10.1177/
0018720809349708
47. Johansson G (1977) Studies on visual-perception of locomotion. Perception 6(4):365-376.
doi: 10.1068/p060365
48. Johnson WH, Sunahara FA, Landolt JP (1999) Importance of the vestibular system in visually
induced nausea and self-vection. J Vestib Res Equilibr Orientation 9(2):83-87
49. Jürgens R, Becker W (2006) Perception of angular displacement without landmarks: evidence
for Bayesian fusion of vestibular, optokinetic, podokinesthetic, and cognitive information. Exp
Brain Res 174(3):528-543. doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0486-7
50. Kennedy RS, Drexler JM, Compton DE, Stanney KM, Lanham DS, Harm DL (2003) Config-
ural scoring of simulator sickness, cybersickness, and space adaptation syndrome: similarities
and differences. In: Lawrence J Hettinger, Micheal W Hwas (eds) Virtual and adaptive envi-
ronments: applications, implications, and human performance, issues, Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates, USA, pp 247-278. http://www.amazon.com/Virtual-Adaptive-Environments-
Applications-Implications/dp/080583107X/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1359862979&
sr=8-2&keywords=Configural+scoring+of+simulator+sickness%2C+cybersickness%
2C+and+space+adaptation+syndrome%3A#reader_080583107X
51. Kitazaki M, Murata A, Onimaru S, Sato T (2008) Vection during walking: effects of vision-
action direction congruency and visual jitter. Poster presented at the International Multisensory
Research Forum, Hamburg, Germany
52. Kitazaki M, Onimaru S, Sato T (2010) Vection and action are incompatible. Presented at
the 2nd IEEE VR 2010 workshop on perveptual illusions in virtual environments (PIVE).
Waltham, USA, pp 22-23
53. Kitazaki M, Sato T (2003) Attentional modulation of self-motion perception. Perception
32(4):475-484. doi: 10.1068/p5037
54. Lackner JR (1977) Induction of illusory self-rotation and nystagmus by a rotating sound-field.
Aviat Space Environ Med 48(2):129-131
55. Lackner JR, DiZio P (1988) Visual stimulation affects the perception of voluntary leg move-
ments during walking. Perception 17(1):71-80. doi: 10.1068/p170071
56. Larsson P, Västfjäll D, Kleiner M (2004) Perception of self-motion and presence in auditory
virtual environments. In: Proceedings of 7th annual workshop of presence, pp 252-258
57. Lepecq JC, Giannopulu I, Baudonniere PM (1995) Cognitive effects on visually induced body
motion in children. Perception 24(4):435-449
58. Lepecq JC, Jouen F, Dubon D (1993) The effect of linear vection on manual aiming at
memorized directions of stationary targets. Perception 22(1):49-60
59. Loomis J, Knapp J (2003) Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual envi-
ronments. In: Hettinger LJ, Haas MW (eds) Virtual and adaptive environments: applications,
implications, and human performance issues. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, USA, pp 21-46
60. Mach E (1875) Grundlinien der Lehre von der Bewegungsempfindung. Engelmann, Leipzig,
Germany
61. Mergner T, Becker W (1990) Perception of horizontal self-rotation: Multisensory and cogni-
tive aspects. In: Warren R, Wertheim AH (eds) Perception and control of self-motion. Erlbaum,
London, pp 219-263
62. Nakamura S (2006) Effects of depth, eccentricity and size of additional static stimulus on
visually induced self-motion perception. Vis Res 46(15):2344-2353. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.
2006.01.016
63. Nakamura S (2008) Effects of stimulus eccentricity on vection reevaluated with a binocularly
defined depth. Jpn Psychol Res 50(2):77-86. doi : 10.1111/j.1468-5884.2008.00363.x
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search