Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
500
1. 0
400
0.8
P
(
p
)
300
0.6
s
av
P
,
σ
200
0.4
s
av
(
p
)
σ
/
σ
0
10 0
0.2
0
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
p
c
p
Behaviour of various quantities as a function of the fraction p of filled bonds, in a bond percolation
simulation on a two-dimensional lattice.
Figure 3.6
cluster or the percolation path. The percolation path for an in
nitely large cluster, as
observed in Monte Carlo simulations, appears at the percolation threshold p
c
.The
percolation threshold for site percolation on a square lattice is found at p
c
=0.59.
Below the threshold there is no percolating path; above the threshold there is one path.
When the simulation on a square lattice takes into account the number of bonds created
instead of the number of sites occupied, the so-called bond percolation on a square
lattice has a threshold of p
c
=0.5.
Another important parameter is the probability that a site belongs to the in
nite
cluster when p > p
c
.Referringtothebond percolation simulation on a square lattice, in
Figure 3.6
one can see the probability P(p) of a bond belonging to the in
nite
cluster. This probability is exactly zero below the threshold, and then increases very
steeply at the threshold. As p approaches 1, P(p)
p. Other important parameters
are seen in
Figure 3.6
: in particular, the increase in s
av
as p approaches p
c
from
below. This simulation also represents the increase of the conductance of a random
resistor network,
≈
σ
ο
versus p, after the threshold, as seen in
Figure 3.6
.Thereisa
small but increasing curvature at and just after p
c
, and then a monotonic but essentially
linear increase up to a value of 1 at full occupancy (p =1).
It is important, at this stage, to clarify that the FS and later theories are not qualitatively
different from those based on percolation
σ
/
-
in fact the FS theory corresponds exactly to
percolation on a so-called Bethe lattice or Cayley tree, a cycle-free lattice in which there
is no overall connectivity until p > p
c
and then the increase is monotonic. The difference
is simply that this lattice is totally
, i.e. it is not embedded in any dimensional
space. Instead, the difference comes from quantitative predictions of the various critical
exponents.
'
oppy
'
Search WWH ::
Custom Search