Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
An example of the reverse analysis result is given in
Fig. 6-5,
which
assumed, whose properties correspond to that of brass, gold, and
aluminum, respectively. The uniaxial stress-strain curves of the input
(true constitutive) properties are given as thick solid lines in
Fig. 6-5a.
The knowledge of their (
E
,
ν
σ ,
n
) is employed in a numerical
indentation simulation using FEM, and the numerical
P
−
curves are
obtained. The simulations are carried out for three indenter angles, with
half apex angle equals to 63.14, 70.3, and
75.79
degrees, respectively.
identify three flow stress-total strain points (symbols) for each material
thin solid lines.
stress-strain tests (lab experiments) are shown in thick solid curves.
These materials do not obey the power-law model exactly. Nevertheless,
such stress-strain curve may still be employed in a numerical simulation
using FEM, and the corresponding
Ph
,
y
data can lead to the results of
reverse analysis. The results of the identified material from the reverse
analysis (symbols) are reasonably close to the input values, and the
discrepancy mainly arises from the fact that these two materials do not
conform to the power-law assumption exactly.
Other researchers have also proposed to measure the elastic modulus
of the material from the unloading curves with a fixed ,
−
with
plastic properties of a specimen could be determined from the reverse
analysis of the dual (or plural) indenter method, however, uniqueness of
reverse analysis emerges as the main issue.
ν
4. Uniqueness of Indentation Analysis
It is well known that single sharp indentation cannot yield unique
solution. Based on extensive FEM simulations over a large range of
materials, Alkorta
et al
.
76
and Tho
et al
.
77
found that only one shape
factor of the
P
−
curve can be claimed independent from unloading
(such as the unloading work) and another one from loading (such as the
Search WWH ::
Custom Search