Hardware Reference
In-Depth Information
z
+
z
−
I
1
I
2
DDCC
V
1
y
1
y
2
V
2
y
3
x
R
1
x
y
1
y
3
R
2
z+
C
DDCC
y
2
z
−
Fig. 14.12 FI with improved low frequency performance proposed by Yuce and Minaei (Adapted
from [
31
]
©
2009 Elsevier)
frequency performance. However, the structure has the drawback of requiring a
matching condition (R
1
¼
R
2
) to simulate a lossless FI.
The equivalent circuit of Fig.
14.12
with parasitic impedances is shown in
Fig.
14.13
, where L
eq
and R
eq
are given by the following expressions:
R
x
1
þ
L
eq
¼
C
þ
C
y
21
þ
C
y
23
ð
R
1
Þ
ð
R
x
2
þ
R
2
Þ
ð
14
:
20
Þ
1
R
eq
¼
ð
R
x
1
þ
R
1
Þ
ð
R
x
2
þ
R
2
Þ
=
ð
R
1
þ
R
x
1
Þ
1
=
ð
R
1
þ
R
x
1
Þ
R
y
21
R
y
23
þ
1
=
ð
14
:
21
Þ
R
eq
can be made zero if we select:
=
R
y
21
R
y
23
=
ð
R
1
þ
R
x
1
Þ
¼
=
ð
R
2
þ
R
x
2
Þ
ð
:
Þ
1
1
1
14
22
On the other hand, if we choose:
=
R
y
21
R
y
23
1
=
ð
R
1
þ
R
x
1
Þ
1
=
ð
R
2
þ
R
x
2
Þ
1
ð
14
:
23
Þ
this will ensure the stability of the circuit operation.
The authors of [
31
] have proposed as many as eight different topologies of FIs,
however, five of them require five CCs of various types while only three configu-
ration therein were implemented with only two CCs and the circuit of Fig.
14.12
is
one of these. For a rigorous analysis of all the FI circuits and their detailed SPICE
simulation results based upon a DDCC implemented with 0.35
μ
m TSMC CMOS
technology parameters, the readers are referred to [
31
].
Search WWH ::
Custom Search