Hardware Reference
In-Depth Information
I B2
−L
I B1
X Z−
DO-CCCII
I 1
I 2
I 1
V 1
Z−
DO-CCCII
X
I 2
V 2
Z+
V 1
V 2
Y
Z+
Y
C
Fig. 9.22 Current-controlled floating negative inductance
capacitance. By a straight forward analysis, the circuit of Fig. 9.23a has the input
impedance given by:
Z 1 Z 2
R x 3
Z in ¼
R x1 þ
R x2 þ
ð
9
:
23
Þ
From this expression, it is seen that with Z 1 ¼
R 2 , the circuit can
realize a resistance in series with a grounded capacitor whose value is
electronically-controllable by the external current I B3 . On the other hand, with Z 1
and Z 2 both taken as capacitors, the circuit would realize a resistance in series with
a grounded FDNR whose value would be controllable by I B3 .
A floating capacitance multiplier employing grounded capacitor is shown in
Fig. 9.23b . This circuit simulates a floating capacitance in series with a resistance
with parameter values as C eq ¼
1/sC 1 and Z 2 ¼
C 1 R x 4
( R x 1 + R x 2 ).
Synthetic transformer may be useful element for constructing stagger-tuned
filters. Compared to passive transformers, an active transformer provides the
advantages of integratability, easy adjustment of the coupling co-efficient and
elimination of any magnetic interference (because they do not employ any induc-
tive component). A circuit using CCCIIs, to simulate a synthetic transformer,
derived from a circuit proposed by Yuce and Minaei [ 21 ], is shown in Figs. 9.24
and 9.27
This circuit is equivalent to an inductive-T network with two self-inductances L 1
and L 2 and mutual inductance M such that the two ports can be modeled by the
following matrix equation:
R x 3 and R eq ¼
¼
I 1
I 2
V 1
V 2
sL p
sM 12
ð
9
:
24
Þ
sM 21
sL s
Search WWH ::




Custom Search