Social Behaviour in Police Interviews: Relating Data to Theories - Conflict and Multimodal Communication: Social Research and Machine Intelligence - page 315

Table 16.2 Variance explained by each factor for the suspect, with
the interpretation of the factors
Suspect
factor

Variance
(%)

Cumulative
variance (%) Interpretation

1 19.41 19.41 Dominance/opposed (based on

frustration), strategy/face
(attack)

2 17.40 36.81 Rapport (building), together

3 15.59 52.39 Submissive/opposed, face

4 6.96 59.35 Together

5 6.65 66.00 Strategy (annoy)

6 6.19 72.19 Information exchange

(questions)

7 5.74 77.93 Information exchange (lies)

8 5.27 83.20 Strategy (surround a fact)

9 4.70 87.91 -

10 4.01 91.92 Politeness (face)

11 3.02 94.93 -

12 2.90 97.83 Rapport (present)

13 2.17 100.00 - (one item: thank)

Table 16.3 Variance explained by each factor for the police, with the
interpretation of the factors
Police
factor

Variance
(%)

Cumulative
variance (%) Interpretation

1 14.77 14.77 Rapport (missing rapport,

negative emotions), arousal,
opposed

2 13.57 28.34 Rapport (present), positivity,

together

3 11.16 39.50 Strategy (avoid), information

exchange (lies)

4 10.46 49.96 Submissive

5 8.83 58.78 Together

6 8.37 67.15 Arousal, dominance

(competitive), strategy (attack)

7 8.01 75.16 Dominance/opposed (based on

strategy)

8 4.61 79.77 -

9 4.56 84.33 Dominance/together

10 4.52 88.85 Strategy (confront)

11 4.16 93.01 Strategy (confront)

12 3.68 96.69 Dominance

13 3.31 100.00 Strategy (confront)