Improvement of Yield per se in Sugarcane - Translational Genomics for Crop Breeding: Abiotic Stress, Yield and Quality - page 221

> 1000 1 2(cp, r1) SM (marker

wise p
value < 0.01)

Early season CCS 8 0.03 0.06 Piperidis et al.

(2008)

Early season brix 6 0.03 0.07

Early season pol 5 0.03 0.07

1(cp) Late season CCS 14 0.03 0.07

Late season brix 15 0.03 0.07

Late season pol 14 0.03 0.06

IJ76-514 ( S. off )x
Q165 (modern
cultivars)

230 AFLP; SSR 2238 2 2(cp; cp) SM (suggestive

level# marker
wise p
value

Early season brix
(%)

9 0.04 0.05 Aitken et al.

(2006)

Mid season brix
(%)

11 0.04 0.07

0.003)
(analysis with
combined data)

<

Early season Pol
(%)

5 0.04 0.05

Mid season Pol (%) 10 0.04 0.06

1 2(cp; r2) SM (suggestive

level# marker
wise p value
<

Cane yield (t/ha) 2 0.04 0.06 Aitken et al.

(2008)

Stalk height (cm) 1 0.05 0.05

Stalk diameter
(mm)

4 0.03 0.08

0.003)

Stalk number 2 0.04 0.06

2 3 (cp; cp; r2) Stalk weight (cm) 1 0.05 0.10

SP80-180 x
SP80-4966 two
pre-commercial
cultivars

108 EST derived RFLP 16 1 1(cp) SM (marker wise

pvalue < 0.01)

Pol 1 0.24 Da Silva et

Bressiani
(2005)

(continued)