Improvement of Yield per se in Sugarcane - Translational Genomics for Crop Breeding: Abiotic Stress, Yield and Quality - page 220

Table 13.1. (Continued)

QTLs
detected
across
experiments

No. of
years (crop
cycle) a

Statistical
analysis and
threshold b

R 2 individual

Population
size

No. of
markers

No. of
locations

Traits c

Population Marker type Min Max References

'Louisiana
Striped' ( S. off) x
'SES 147B' ( S.
spont )

100 AFLP, SRAP and

TRAP

650 1 2(cp,r1) IM and CIM

(LOD

Early brix 8 0.03 0.34 Alwala et al.

(2009)

3.01);
nonparametric
discriminant
analysis

>

1(cp) Late brix 6 0.04 0.27

1(r1) Early pol 8 0.08 0.15

1(cp) Late pol 3 0.09 0.10

Crosses involving modern cultivars
selfing of R570 295 AFLP 1180 1 2(cp, r1) SM (marker

wise p
value

Brix 2 0.03 0.04 Hoarau et al.

(2002)

< 0.005) Stalk height 1 0.03 0.03

Stalk diameter 2 0.03 0.05

Stalk number 1 0.07 0.07

Q117 x 74C42 108 RFLP and RAFs

(radio-labelled
amplified
fragments)

258 2 2(cp; r1) SM (marker

wise p
value < 0.01)

Stalk number 16 - - Jordan et al.

(2004)

Sucker number 14 - -

Q117 x
MQ77-340 two
moderns cultivars

232 AFLP and SSR 400 (only for

MQ77-340)

1 2(cp, r1) SM (marker

wise p
value

Early season CCS ' 2 0.03 0.04 Reffay et al.

(2005)

Early season brix 1 0.03 0.03

< 0.01) Early season pol 1 0.03 0.03

1(cp) SM (marker

wise p
value

Late season CCS 5 0.03 0.07

Late season brix 5 0.03 0.06

< 0.01)

Late season pol 5 0.03 0.07

Fiber 2 0.02 0.03

Stalk weight 8 0.02 0.07

Cane yield 3 0.02 0.03

Sugar yield 3 0.02 0.03