Source Apportionment of Airborne Dust in Germany: Methods and Results - Urban Air Quality in Europe - page 215

10. Ebert M, Weinbruch S, Hoffmann P, Ortner HM (2004) The chemical characterization and
complex refractive index of rural and urban influenced aerosols determined by individual
particle analysis. Atmos Environ 38:6531-6545
11. Worringen A, Ebert M, Weinbruch S (2010) Entwicklung von Methoden zur qualitativen und
quantitativen Quellzuordnung von Aerosolpartikeln an einem Verkehrs-Hotspot. Endbericht
zum Forschungsvorhaben. TU Darmstadt, Institut fur Angewandte Geowissenschaft, Fachgebiet
Umweltmineralogie, Darmstadt (Juni 2010)
12. Schauer JJ, Lough GC, Shafer et al (2006) Characterization of metals emitted from motor
vehicles. Report no. 133. Health Effects Institute
13. Quass U, Kuhlbusch TAJ, Koch M (2004) Identifizierung von Quellgruppen fur die
Feinstaubfraktion. IUTA report LP15/2004. Download from http://www.iuta.de/files/
feinstaubnrw_2004_abschlussbericht.pdf , Accessed 5 Feb 2012
14. IVU (2003) Ursachenanalyse von Feinstaub (PM10)-Immissionen in Berlin unter
Berucksichtigung von Messungen der Staubinhaltsstoffe am Stadtrand in der Innenstadt und
in einer Straßenschlucht (Los 4 und 5 Ausbreitungsrechnung und Ursachenanalyse fur die
urbane und lokale Skala) IVU Umwelt GmbH Senate. Department of Urban Development,
Berlin
15. IVU (2012) IMMIS air quality models. Web information http://www.ivu-umwelt.de/
front_content.php?idcat ¼ 30&changelang ¼ 2&idart ¼ 23 , Accessed 5 Feb 2012
16. TRUMF (2012) http://www.geo.fu-berlin.de/met/ag/trumf/RCG/RCG_Internet_description.
pdf , Accessed 5 Feb 2012
17. RIU (2012) http://www.eurad.uni-koeln.de/index_e.html?/modell/eurad_descr_e.html , Accessed 5
Feb 2012
18. Stern R, Builtjes P, Schaap M et al (2008) A model inter-comparison study focussing on
episodes with elevated PM10 concentrations. Atmos Environ 42:4567-4588
19. Koo B, Wilson GM, Morris RE, Dunker Yarwood G (2009) Comparison of source apportion-
ment and sensitivity analysis in a particulate matter air quality model. Environ Sci Technol
43:6669-6675
20. Stohl A (1998) Computation accuracy and applications of trajectories - a review and bibliography.
Atmos Environ 32:947-966
21. Draxler RR, Hess GD (1998) An overview of the HYSPLIT_4 modeling system of trajectories,
dispersion, and deposition. Aust Meteorol Mag 47:295-308
22. Stohl A, Eckhardt S, Forster C et al (2002) A replacement for simple back trajectory
calculations in the interpretation of atmospheric trace substance measurements. Atmos
Environ 36:4635-4648
23. Stohl A (1996) Trajectory statistics - a new method to establish source-receptor relationships
of air pollutants and its application to the transport of particulate sulfate in Europe. Atmos
Environ 30:579-587
24. Ashbaugh LL, Malm WC, Zadeh WZ (1985) A residence time probability analysis of sulfur
concentrations at grand canyon national park. Atmos Environ 19:1263-1270
25. Zeng Y, Hopke PK (1989) A study of the sources of acid precipitation in Ontario, Canada.
Atmos Environ 23:1499-1509
26. Wang YQ, Zhang XY, Draxler RR. (2009) TrajStat: GIS-based software that uses various
trajectory statistical analysis methods to identify potential sources from long-term air pollution
measurement data. Environ Modell Softw 24:938. Download of product from http://www.
meteothinker.com/TrajStatProduct.html , Accessed 5 Feb 2012
27. Quass U, Kuhlbusch TAJ, Hugo A et al (2007) German contribution to the EMEP TFMM
assessment report on particulate matter. IUTA-Report Nr. LP 34/2007. Available at
http://www.nilu.no/projects/ccc/tfmm/ , Accessed 5 Feb 2012
28. Birmili W, Engler C (2011) Studie zur Charakterisierung und Quantifizierung der r aumlichen

€

Herkunft der PM10-Belastung an hoch belasteten Orten. Ausarbeitung f ur das Umweltbundesamt

€

Fachgebiet II 4.2 F orderkennzeichen 31201283. www.env-it.de/luftdaten/download/public/docs/

€