Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
(1)
(2)
(3)
a'
b'
(4)
(5)
(6)
Fig. 8.
(1) An unfolding
W
of
d
(
P
)ofaprism
P
whose base is an equilateral triangle;
(2)
P
included in the unfolding; (3) dissection and hinges; (4) the resulting figure
transformed by dissection and hinges shown in (3); (5) another dissection of
W
by
the 2-complex strictly congruent to the mirror image of the cut 2-complex in Fig.
7
(4);
(6) the resulting figure by dissection and hinges shown in (5) which is strictly congruent
to the polyhedron shown in Fig.
7
(5).
If
P
∗
is dissected into
n
(where
n
is the number of faces of
P
) pieces to obtain
W
, the cut 2-complex except its boundary is included in the interior of
P
∗
,and
hence
∂W
is transformed to the interior of
P
m
except some line segments.
W
is
reversible to
X
by
P
m
ↂ
X
.
Theorem 2.
Let
P
be a tetrahedron which is a half-
ST
or a quarter-
ST
.Any
convex unfoldings
W
of
d
(
P
)
is transformable to any convex unfolding
X
of
d
(
P
m
)
, where we assume
P
X
.If
W
divides
P
∗
into four pieces
by its corresponding cut 2-complex,
W
is reversible to
X
.
W
and
P
m
ↂ
ↂ
Proof.
The proof is similar to the one of Theorem
1
, so we omit it.
If a polyhedron
W
is reversible to itself,
W
is called
self-reversible
.
Corollary 1.
Let
P
be a reflective space-filling polyhedron whose mirror image
is strictly congruent to
P
,and
n
be the number of faces of
P
. If the cut 2-
complex of a convex unfolding
W
of
d
(
P
)
divides
P
∗
into
n
non-empty pieces,
W
is self-reversible, where we assume
P
ↂ
W
.
Proof.
If an unfolding
W
is combinatorially equivalent to a truncated octahe-
dron, rhombic dodecahedron, or an elongated dodecahedron, the corresponding
Search WWH ::
Custom Search