Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
(1)
(2)
(3)
a'
b'
(4)
(5)
(6)
Fig. 8. (1) An unfolding W of d ( P )ofaprism P whose base is an equilateral triangle;
(2) P included in the unfolding; (3) dissection and hinges; (4) the resulting figure
transformed by dissection and hinges shown in (3); (5) another dissection of W by
the 2-complex strictly congruent to the mirror image of the cut 2-complex in Fig. 7 (4);
(6) the resulting figure by dissection and hinges shown in (5) which is strictly congruent
to the polyhedron shown in Fig. 7 (5).
If P is dissected into n (where n is the number of faces of P ) pieces to obtain
W , the cut 2-complex except its boundary is included in the interior of P ,and
hence ∂W is transformed to the interior of P m except some line segments. W is
reversible to X by P m
X .
Theorem 2. Let P be a tetrahedron which is a half- ST or a quarter- ST .Any
convex unfoldings W of d ( P ) is transformable to any convex unfolding X of
d ( P m ) , where we assume P
X .If W divides P into four pieces
by its corresponding cut 2-complex, W is reversible to X .
W and P m
Proof. The proof is similar to the one of Theorem 1 , so we omit it.
If a polyhedron W is reversible to itself, W is called self-reversible .
Corollary 1. Let P be a reflective space-filling polyhedron whose mirror image
is strictly congruent to P ,and n be the number of faces of P . If the cut 2-
complex of a convex unfolding W of d ( P ) divides P
into n non-empty pieces,
W is self-reversible, where we assume P
W .
Proof. If an unfolding W is combinatorially equivalent to a truncated octahe-
dron, rhombic dodecahedron, or an elongated dodecahedron, the corresponding
Search WWH ::




Custom Search