Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
that can be resisted by each main plate girder was 6683.7 kN at a deflection
of 318.8 mm. The design load predicted using EC3 [1.27] for each main
plate girder was also plotted in Figure 6.36 , which was 5763.3 kN. The finite
element failure load was 16% higher than the design load, which shows that
the design rules specified in the EC3 [1.27] are conservative and accurate.
REFERENCES
[6.1] C.J. Earls, B.J. Shah, High performance steel bridge girder compactness, J. Constr.
Steel Res. 58 (2002) 859-880.
[6.2] N.E. Shanmugam, M. Mahendrakumar, V. Thevendran, Ultimate load behaviour of
horizontally curved plate girders, J. Constr. Steel Res. 59 (2003) 509-529.
[6.3] Y.L. Pi, N.S. Trahair, Nonlinear elastic behaviour of I-beams curved in plan, J. Struct.
Eng. ASCE 123 (9) (1997) 1201-1209.
[6.4] Y.L. Pi, M.A. Bradford, N.S. Trahair, Inelastic analysis and behaviour of steel I-beams
curved in plan, J. Struct. Eng. ASCE 126 (7) (2000) 772-779.
[6.5] W.D. Corte, P.V. Bogaert, The effect of shear deformations in floor beams on the
moment distribution in orthotropic plated bridge decks, J. Constr. Steel Res.
62 (2006) 1007-1015.
[6.6] R. Wolchuk, Design Manual for Orthotropic Steel Plate Deck Bridges, AISC,
Chicago, IL, 1963.
[6.7] M.S. Troitsky, Orthotropic Bridges: Theory and Design, second ed., The James F.
Lincoln Arc. Welding Foundation, Cleveland, OH, 1968.
[6.8] J.P. Felkel, D.C. Rizos, P.H. Ziehl, Structural performance and design evaluation of
HPS 70W bridge girders, J. Constr. Steel Res. 63 (2007) 909-921.
[6.9] P. Galvin, J. Dominguez, Dynamic analysis of a cable-stayed deck steel arch bridge, J.
Constr. Steel Res. 63 (2007) 1024-1035.
[6.10] ANSYS Inc., ANSYS Manual: Theory, Elements and Commands References,
ANSYS Inc., Houston, TX, 2005.
[6.11] A. Romeijn, C. Bouras, Investigation of the arch in-plane buckling behaviour in arch
bridges, J. Constr. Steel Res. 64 (2008) 1349-1356.
[6.12] M.E.A.H. Eldib, Shear buckling strength and design of curved corrugated steel webs
for bridges, J. Constr. Steel Res. 65 (2009) 2129-2139.
[6.13] H. Zhang, R. DesRoches, Z. Yang, S. Liu, Experimental and analytical studies on a
streamlined steel box girder, J. Constr. Steel Res. 66 (2010) 906-914.
[6.14] C. Graciano, E. Casanova, J. Mart´nez, Imperfection sensitivity of plate girder webs
subjected to patch loading, J. Constr. Steel Res. 67 (2011) 1128-1133.
[6.15] M. Chryssanthopoulos, M. Baker, P. Dowling, Imperfection modeling for buckling
analysis of stiffened cylinders, J. Struct. Eng. ASCE 117 (1) (1991) 1998-2017.
[6.16] M. Chryssanthopoulos, Probabilistic buckling analysis of plates and shells, Thin-
Walled Struct. 30 (1-4) (1998) 135-157.
[6.17] O. Caglayan, K. Ozakgul, O. Tezer, E. Uzgider, Evaluation of a steel railway bridge
for dynamic and seismic loads, J. Constr. Steel Res. 67 (2011) 1198-1211.
[6.18] COSMOS/M, User's Manual, Solid Works Corporation, Dassault Syst´mes,
Massachusetts, 2008.
[6.19] A.C. Altuni¸ik, A. Bayraktar, B. Sevim, H. ¨ zdemir, Experimental and analytical sys-
tem identification of Eynel arch type steel highway bridge, J. Constr. Steel Res.
67 (2011) 1912-1921.
[6.20] SAP2000, Integrated Finite Element Analysis and Design of Structures, Computers
and Structures Inc, Berkeley, CA, 2008.
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search