Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
steel-concrete composite bridges, in accordance with a loading period
appropriate to the natural frequency of the bridge.
According to EC1, the dynamic factor
F
takes account of the dynamic
magnification of stresses and vibration effects in the structure but does not
take account of resonance effects. Where a dynamic analysis is required,
there is a risk that resonance or excessive vibration of the bridge may occur
(with a possibility of excessive deck accelerations leading to ballast instability
and excessive deflections and stresses). For such cases, a dynamic analysis shall
be carried out to calculate impact and resonance effects. Quasi-static
methods that use static load effects multiplied by the dynamic factor
F
are unable to predict resonance effects from high-speed trains. Dynamic
analysis techniques, which take into account the time-dependent nature
of the loading from the high-speed load model (HSLM) and real trains
(e.g., by solving equations of motion), are required for predicting dynamic
effects at resonance. Bridges carrying more than one track should be consid-
ered without any reduction of dynamic factor
F
. The dynamic factor
F
that
enhances the static load effects under Load Models 71, SW/0, and SW/2
shall be taken as either
F
2
or
F
3
. Generally, the dynamic factor
F
is taken
as either
F
2
or
F
3
according to the quality of track maintenance as follows:
(a) For carefully maintained track,
1
:
44
F
2
¼
p
L
F
2
+0
:
82 with
:
1
:
00
F
2
1
:
67
ð
3
:
20
Þ
0
:
(b) For track with standard maintenance,
:
2
16
F
3
¼
p
L
F
2
+0
:
73 with
:
1
:
0
F
3
2
:
0
ð
3
:
21
Þ
0
:
where
L
F
is the “determinant” length (length associated with
F
)definedin
Table 3.10
in meters. The dynamic factors were established for simply sup-
ported girders. The length
L
F
allows these factors to be used for other structural
memberswithdifferent support conditions. If nodynamic factor is specified,
F
3
shall beused.The dynamic factor
F
shall not beusedwith the loadingdue to real
trains, the loading due to fatigue trains, HSLM, and the load model “unloaded
3.5.3 Accidental Forces
3.5.3.1 General
Steel and steel-concrete composite bridges may be subjected to forces result-
ing from accidental situations. The situations comprise vehicle collision with
Search WWH ::
Custom Search