Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
in reducing area wide congestion, however, is limited if only a small percentage of the
total employees and employers tend to participate in their implementation. Even the
successful CTR program in Washington State impacted only 6 % of the state
sVMT.
However, the Washington State Commuter Reduction Program (CTR) has
shown how coordinated public-private actions can mitigate congestion, and should
set an example for congestion management in other large metropolitan areas.
'
References
1. Kuzmyac JR, Evans JE, Pratt R (2001) Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Report
95: traveler response to transportation system changes, chapter 19
—
employer and institutional
TDM strategies. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC
2. Keyani BI, Putnam ES (1976) Transportation system management: state of the art. Prepared by
INTERPLAN corporation for urban mass transportation administration. US Department of
Transportation, s.1. September 1976
3. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Planning and Development Department (1975)
Flexible work hours experiment at the port authority of New York and New Jersey,
1974
-
1975. Urban mass transportation administration, US Department of Transportation
4. Safavian R, McLean KG (1975) Variable work hours
—
who bene
ts. Traf
c Eng 45(3):17
5. Giuliano G (1992) Transportation demand management: promise or panacea. APA J 58
(3):327
335
6. Berald S (1990) Bishop ranch 1990 transportation survey. Bay Area Rides, Oakland
(December 1990)
7. Cambridge Systematics, Inc (1981) Denver federal employee work week experiment
-
—
evaluation of
transportation related impacts. Prepared for denver
regional council of
government, sl September 1981
8. Freas AM, Anderson SM (1991) Effect of variable hours work programs on ridesharing and
organizational effectiveness: a case study, Ventura county. Transportation Research Record
(TRR) 1321
9. Association for Commuter Transportation, Urbantrans Consultants, PB Parsons Brinckerhoff,
and ESTE (2004) Mitigating congestion: the role of demand-side strategies. In partnership
with the federal highway administration. US Department of Transportation, sl
10. Zhou L, Winter OL (2008) Empirical analysis of compressed workweek choices.
Transportation Research Record (TRR) 2046
11. Rathbone NB (1992) Telecommuting in the United States. ITE J 62(12), December 1992
12. Walls M, Sa
rova E, Jiang Y (2000) What drives telecommuting
'
s relative impacts of worker
demographics, employer characteristics, and job types. Transportation Reseach Record (TRR)
2010
13. Vehicle Technologies Program: Fact #486: September 10, 2007 Teleworking Trends. sl
http://
14. Telework (2011) A worldatwork special report. Worldatwork, sl June 2011
15. Cotton K, Johnston K, Leotta K, Stark S (2012) Washington state
s commute trip reduction
program: reducing emissions and growing the economy by managing transportation demand.
TR news 281. July
'
August 2012
16. Rutherford GS, Bacigett SI, Ishirnaru JM, Maclachlan S (1994) Transportation demand
management: case studies of medium-sized employers. Transportation Research Record
(TRR) 1459
17. Harrison F, Jones D, and Jovanis P (1979) Flextime and comntuting behcrior in San Francisco:
some preliminary
findings. Summary Report, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of
California, Berkeley, CA
-
