Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Fig. 3.19 Representation of
the essential boundaries
Using the nodal sets X
Cu
ð
C
Þ
and X
Cu
ð
S
Þ
, two new sets of integration points
Q
Cu
ð
C
Þ
¼ q
1
;
q
2
;
...
;
q
QC
n o
2
C
u
ð
C
Þ
and Q
Cu
ð
S
Þ
¼
f
q
1
;
q
2
;
...
;
q
QS
g2
C
u
ð
S
Þ
are
respectively defined, in which QC represents the number of integration points
along the boundary curve C
u
ð
C
Þ
and QS stands for the number of integration point
inside of the area of the essential boundary surface C
u
ð
S
Þ
. As mentioned in
Sect. 3.4.4
, each integration point on set Q
Cu
ð
C
Þ
represents an infinitesimal curve
and the integration points on set Q
Cu
ð
S
Þ
represent infinitesimal surface areas.
Therefore, the integration weight
_
C
I
of each integration point represents a length if
q
I
2
Q
Cu
ð
C
Þ
, or a surface area if q
I
2
Q
Cu
ð
S
Þ
. In Fig.
3.19
are presented the field
nodes and the integration points along the essential boundary curve C
u
ð
C
Þ
and the
essential boundary surface C
u
ð
S
Þ
.
Additionally, it is required to establish new influence-domains for each one
interest point q
I
discretizing the essential boundary. However, the nodes making
the new influence-domains have to belong to the essential boundary curve C
u
ð
C
Þ
if
q
I
2
Q
Cu
ð
C
Þ
, or to the essential boundary surface C
u
ð
S
Þ
if q
I
2
Q
Cu
ð
S
Þ
. Notice that
the meshless shape functions constructed to approximate the field variable on the
boundary for each one integration point q
I
are constructed using only the field
nodes on the essential boundary.
Neglecting the dynamic term of the Galerkin weak form presented in Eq. (
2.65
)
and adding the Lagrange multipliers, the Galerkin weak form expression can be
written as,
2
4
3
5
¼
0
Z
d L
ð
T
cL
ð
dX
Z
X
du
T
b dX
Z
Ct
Z
du
T
t dC
t
d
k
T
ð
u
u
Þ
dC
u
X
Cu
ð
3
:
38
Þ
The last variational term results from the Lagrange multipliers method and it is
included in the expression to ensure: u
u ¼ 0. The last term can be developed,