Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
ϕ(β, α) = (
{
,
+
,
+
} ,
{
,
{
,
}} ) = (
,
)
min
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
max
0
min
1
0
1
0
0
1
With the intuitionistic fuzzy Lukasiewicz implication, the traditional triangle
product and the square product (Kohout and Bandler 1980), below we further intro-
duce an intuitionistic fuzzy triangle product and an intuitionistic fuzzy square product
respectively:
Definition 2.39 (Wang et al. 2012) Let
α ={ α 1 2 ,...,α l } ={ γ 1 2 ,...,γ m }
and
β ={ β 1 2 ,...,β n }
be three sets of IFVs, Z 1
F
× γ)
and Z 2
F
× β)
two
intuitionistic fuzzy relations, then an intuitionistic fuzzy triangle product Z 1
Z 2
F
× β)
of Z 1 and Z 2 can be defined as:
1
m
m
m
1
m
(
Z 1
Z 2 )(α i j ) =
1 μ Z 1 i k ) Z 2 k j ) ,
v Z 1 i k ) Z 2 k j )
,
k
=
k
=
1
for any
i j ) (α, β),
i
=
1
,
2
,...,
l
;
j
=
1
,
2
,...,
n
(2.203)
where “
” represents the intuitionistic fuzzy Lukasiewicz implication.
Similarly, Wang et al. (2012) defined an intuitionistic fuzzy square product
Z 1
Z 2
F
× β)
of Z 1 and Z 2 as:
m μ min ( Z 1 i k ) Z 2 k j ), Z 2 k j ) Z 1 i k )) ,
v min ( Z 1 i k ) Z 2 k j ), Z 2 k j ) Z 1 i k ))
(
Z 1
Z 2 )(α i j ) =
min
1
k
for any
i j ) (α, β),
i
=
1
,
2
,...,
l
;
j
=
1
,
2
,...,
n
(2.204)
for short, and the same with others.
As a result, Eqs. ( 2.203 ) and ( 2.204 ) can be respectively simplified as:
For convenience, we denote z ik as Z
i k )
m
m
1
m
1
m
(
Z 1
Z 2 )(α i j ) =
1 μ z ik z kj ,
v z ik z kj
(2.205)
j
=
j
=
1
m μ min ( z ik z kj , z kj z ik ) ,
v min ( z ik z kj , z kj z ik ) (2.206)
(
Z 1
Z 2 )(α i j ) =
min
1
k
Indeed, the intuitionistic fuzzy triangle product and the intuitionistic fuzzy square
product are very closely-related with each other. That is, the former is the basis of
the latter, due to that
(
Z 1
Z 2 )(α i j )
is directly derived from
(
Z 1
Z 2 )(α i j )
and
(
Z 2
Z 1 )(α i j )
.
 
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search