Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
If
S
α
F
n
<
S
α
F
n
and
S
α
F
n
>
S
α
F
n
, then by using Xu and Yager
(2006)'s ranking method, we have
α
F
n
GIFPWAF
w
(α
1
,α
2
,...,α
n
)<α
F
n
<
(1.358)
S
α
F
n
, i.e.,
If
S
α
F
n
=
μ
F
n
v
F
n
μ
α
F
n
−
v
=
max
j
−
min
j
(1.359)
κ
α
j
,λ
α
j
(
α
j
)
κ
α
j
,λ
α
j
(
α
j
)
α
F
n
then by Eqs. (
1.349
) and (
1.355
), we have
v
F
n
μ
α
F
n
=
max
j
μ
F
n
,
α
F
n
=
min
j
(1.360)
κ
α
j
,λ
α
j
(
α
j
)
κ
α
j
,λ
α
j
(
α
j
)
then
v
F
n
h
α
F
n
H
α
F
n
=
μ
α
F
n
+
=
μ
F
n
+
=
v
α
F
n
max
j
min
j
κ
α
j
,λ
α
j
(
α
j
)
κ
α
j
,λ
α
j
(
α
j
)
So we have
GIFPWAF
w
(α
1
,α
2
,...,α
m
)
=
α
F
n
(1.361)
S
α
F
n
, i.e.,
If
S
α
F
n
=
v
F
n
μ
α
F
n
−
v
α
F
n
=
min
j
μ
F
n
−
max
j
(1.362)
κ
α
j
,λ
α
j
(
α
j
)
κ
α
j
,λ
α
j
(
α
j
)
then by Eqs. (
1.350
) and (
1.354
), we have
μ
F
n
v
F
n
μ
α
F
n
=
,
=
min
j
v
α
F
n
max
j
(1.363)
κ
α
j
,λ
α
j
(α
)
κ
α
j
,λ
α
j
(α
)
j
j
hence
μ
F
n
v
F
n
h
α
F
n
(1.364)
H
α
F
n
=
μ
α
F
n
+
v
=
min
j
+
max
j
=
α
κ
α
j
,λ
α
j
(α
j
)
κ
α
j
,λ
α
j
(α
j
)
F
n
Thus, it follows that
GIFPWAF
w
(α
1
,α
2
,...,α
n
)
=
α
F
n
(1.365)
and then from Eqs. (
1.358
), (
1.361
) and (
1.365
), we know that (2) always holds.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search