Digital Signal Processing Reference
In-Depth Information
shows that the minimized error can be large for channels with very small
singular values
σ
h,k
.
Indeed there is no upper bound on how large the error
can get because the smallest nonzero singular value
σ
h,M−
1
can be arbi-
trarily small for very bad channels. A similar observation was also made
in Chap. 11 where we considered the special case of diagonal channels. In
Chap. 13, where we study the MMSE transceiver
without
the zero-forcing
constraint, we will see that this problem goes away.
5.
Minimized error and noise power
. Equation (12.66) also shows that the
minimized error is proportional to the channel noise variance
σ
q
,asone
would expect.
6.
Minimized error and channel input power
. From Eq. (12.66) we see that
E
mmse
decreases with increasing channel input power
p
0
.
This is intuitively
appealing of course, and it comes about as follows: if we incre
ase
the
channel power
p
0
for fixed
σ
s
, then the multipliers
σ
f,k
=
c/
√
σ
h,k
in
the transmit
ter
are larger (because
c
is scaled up). So the multipliers
σ
g,k
=1
/c
√
σ
h,k
at the receiver will get correspondingly smaller, which
reduces the reconstruction error.
7.
Signal-to-noise ratio
. From Eq. (12.66) we see that
M−
1
2
=
σ
q
p
0
E
mmse
σ
s
1
σ
h,k
.
k
=0
This ratio is clearly independent of
σ
s
.Infact,
σ
s
can be set to unity in
all discussions without loss of generality.
8.
Diagonal channel
. Suppose the channel
H
is a diagonal matrix with real
non-negative diagonal elements. It then follows that the unitary matrices
in its SVD are
U
h
=
V
h
=
I
, so the optimal precoder and equalizer
(essentially
Σ
f
and
Σ
g
) are also diagonal matrices. (In Chap. 11 this was
assumed without proof.) If
P>M
then the first
M
dominant diagonal
elements of
H
are used by the transceiver as seen in Fig. 12.5. If the
diagonal channel
H
has complex diagonal entries then the matrices
U
h
and
V
h
are diagonal unitary matrices (i.e., their diagonal entries are of
the form
e
jθ
k
), and can be combined with diagonal matrices
Σ
f
and
Σ
g
.
The result is again an optimal transceiver with diagonal precoder and
equalizer.
Example 12.2: ZF-MMSE transceiver
Consider the simple 2
×
2 channel
√
3
1 + (
√
3
/
16)
⎡
⎣
⎤
⎦
.
−
(1
/
16)
1
2
√
2
H
=
√
3+(1
/
16)
(
√
3
/
16)
1
−
Search WWH ::
Custom Search