Database Reference
In-Depth Information
Lemma 12
For any two simple instance-databases A and B ,
A B = B A and
A B A B.
Proof If A
B , the claim is clear because all relationships above are identities.
From Definition 27 ,
(i) A B ={ ( A i ) | φ i Σ A }∪{ ( B j ) | ψ j Σ B }= B A .
Let us show that id A
=
B are the
identity morphisms) is the identity morphism id A B for A B . In fact, for
any morphisms f
id B (where id A :
A
A,id B :
B
g
:
A B
C D (with f
:
A
C,g
:
B
D ),
(id A
=
=
(f
g , and for any morphism
h k : C D A B (with h : C A,k : D B ), (id A
g)
id B )
(f
id A )
(g
id B )
f
id B ) (k h) =
(id A
k)
(id B
k)
=
h
k . Thus, id
=
(id A
id B )
:
A B
A B is equal
to the identity arrow of A B , i.e.,
(ii) id A
id A B .
In point 2 of Example 19 , it was demonstrated that (id A
id B =
:
id B )
A
B
A B is the identity arrow id A B of the object A B as well. That is,
(iii) id A
id A B .
Let us show now that the morphism (id A
id B =
id B )
:
A B
A
B is an
isomorphism, with its inverse morphism
id B ) OP
id O A
id O B =
(id A
=
id A
id B :
A
B
A B.
In fact,
id B ) OP
(id A
id B )
(id A
=
(id A
id B )
(id A
id B )
=
(id A
id A )
(id B
id B )
=
id A
id B
from ( iii )
id A B :
=
A
B
A
B the identity ),
and analogously,
id B ) OP
(id A
(id A
id B )
=
id B
from ( ii )
id A
=
id A B :
A B
A B the identity ).
Consequently, (id A
id B )
:
A B
A
B is an isomorphism, i.e.,
B .
Thus, we have from (iv) and (i) that A B A B = B A B A and hence
A
(iv) A B
A
B
B
A as it was demonstrated in Lemma 9 .
Notice that T(A B) ={ ( A ,v i ) | v i TA }∪{ ( B ,v j ) | v j TB }= TA TB =
T(A
}= id A id B =
={
|
v i
}∪{
|
v j
id A
id B =
B)
( 1 ,v i )
TA
( 2 ,v j )
TB
id A B . However, from (iv), id A B =
= id A B , so that for the
T(A B)
T(A
B)
Search WWH ::




Custom Search