Database Reference
In-Depth Information
= k
l 2
h 2 f
k T (l 2 h 2 ) f
in OP
=
in
f OP
=
T e (l 1
h 1 ;
l 2
h 2 )
T e (l 1 ;
h 2 ) .
=
l 2 )
(h 1 ;
Thus, T e ((l 1 ;
T e (l 1 ;
T e (h 1 ;
(h 1 ;
=
h 2 ) .
Let us show this functorial composition property also when we have the complex
arrows. We have (from Lemma 11 ):
(i) in
l 2 )
h 2 ))
l 2 )
in OP
Tg OP .
g =
g OP
Thus,
T e (l 1 ;
T e (h 1 ;
in OP
in OP
l 2 )
h 2 )
=
k
T(l 2
g)
in g OP
g
T(h 2
f)
in
f OP
in OP
Tg OP
=
k
T(l 2
T(h 2
g)
f)
in
f OP
from ( i )
T l 2
f
in OP
g OP
=
k
h 2
g
in
f OP
T l 2 g
g
h 1
in OP
g OP
=
k
in
f OP
( since h 2
f
=
g
h 1 )
in OP
=
k T(l 2 g h 1 )
in
f OP
( from Lemma 11 )
k T (l 2 h 2 ) f
in OP
=
in
f OP
( since h 2 f = g h 1 )
= T e (l 1 h 1 ; l 2 h 2 ) = T e (l 1 ; l 2 ) (h 1 ; h 2 ) .
For any identity arrow id A , T e J(id A )
= id A =
TA
A . Thus, as required by Defi-
nition 5 , the natural isomorphism ϕ
I DB is valid.
Let us show that DB is an extended symmetric category, i.e., τ 1
:
T e
=
:
τ
ψ
−→ S nd for vertical composition of natural transformations τ : F st
−→ T e and
F st
−→
τ 1
:
T e
S nd , so that for each object J(f)
=
A,B,f
in DB
DB , the follow-
ing diagram commutes (we recall that ψ J(f) =
ψ(J(f))
=
f ),
where
f
=
T e J(f) = f
f ji ,
f
f ji
Search WWH ::




Custom Search