Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
The object detection method was implemented on a PC with an Intel Core 2 Duo
2.5 GHz processor. The method ran with single-thread processing.
In this experiment, we implement false positive and recall as performance evalu-
ation measures, as defined below:
correctly detected object movements
total detected object movements
false positive
=
1
(10)
correctly detected object movements
total object movements in the images
=
recall
(11)
In this experiment, we calculated performance of the proposed method under vari-
ant threshold parameters R th , C th , E rth , L mt h , W th . We compare the proposed method
with the proposed method without the layered background model (object movement
detection by only edge subtraction), and our previous method by the pixel-level lay-
ered background model [20]. The original object movement detection method via
the pixel-level layered background model cannot handle object movements which
exists in initial state, we added edge subtraction based object movement classifica-
tion (mentioned in 4.2) to the method.
Fig. 8 shows the resulting detection performance in various parameters. As can
be seen from the graph, where false positive is from 0.05 to 0.25, the detection
performance by the region-level background subtraction method is superior to the
detection performance by the pixel-level background subtraction method. This is
because of that the region-level background subtraction method is robust to back-
ground clutter (e.g. small object shift, small shadow regions).
1
0.8
0.6
layeredgraphcut
nonlayeredgraphcut
layeredpixellevel
0.4
0.2
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
false positive
Fig. 8 ROC curves of the proposed method. The solod line: by the proposed method. The
broken line: by the proposed method without the layered background model. The dashed-
dotted line: by our pixel-level object movement detection method [20].
Search WWH ::




Custom Search