Biology Reference
In-Depth Information
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA
,
100(6):3107-12, 2003.
44.
Krijgsveld, J., R. F. Ketting, T. Mahmoudi, et al. Metabolic labeling of
C. elegans
and
D. melanogaster
for quantitative proteomics.
Nature
Biotechnology
, 21(8):927-31, 2003.
45.
Wu, C. C., M. J. MacCoss, K. E. Howell, et al. Metabolic labeling of mam-
malian organisms with stable isotopes for quantitative proteomic analysis.
Analytical Chemistry
, 76(17):4951-9, 2004.
46.
Stocklin, R., J. F. Arrighi, K. Hoang-Van, et al. Positive and negative
labeling of human proinsulin, insulin, and C-peptide with stable isotopes.
New tools for in vivo pharmacokinetic and metabolic studies.
Methods in
Molecular Biology
, 146:293-315, 2000.
47.
Ong, S. E., L. J. Foster and M. Mann. Mass spectrometric-based approaches
in quantitative proteomics.
Methods
, 29(2):124-30, 2003.
48.
Lill, J. Proteomic tools for quantitation by mass spectrometry.
Mass
Spectrometry Reviews
, 22(3):182-94, 2003.
49.
Gygi, S. P., B. Rist, S. A. Gerber, et al. Quantitative analysis of complex
protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags.
Nature Biotechnology
,
17(10):994-9, 1999.
50.
Zhang, H., W. Yan and R. Aebersold. Chemical probes and tandem mass
spectrometry: a strategy for the quantitative analysis of proteomes and
subproteomes.
Current Opinion in Chemical Biology
, 8(1):66-75, 2004.
51.
MacCoss, M. J. and J. R. Yates III. Proteomics: analytical tools and
techniques.
Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care
,
4(5):369-75, 2001.
52.
Bondarenko, P. V., D. Chelius and T. A. Shaler. Identification and relative
quantitation of protein mixtures by enzymatic digestion followed by cap-
illary reversed-phase liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
Analytical Chemistry
, 74(18):4741-9, 2002.
53.
Ruse, C. I., B. Willard, J. P. Jin, et al. Quantitative dynamics of site-specific
protein phosphorylation determined using liquid chromatography elec-
trospray ionization mass spectrometry.
Analytical Chemistry
, 74(7):1658-64,
2002.
54.
Willard, B. B., C. I. Ruse, J. A. Keightley, et al. Site-specific quantitation of
protein nitration using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrome-
try.
Analytical Chemistry
, 75(10):2370-6, 2003.
55.
Barnidge, D. R., E. A. Dratz, T. Martin, et al. Absolute quantification of the
G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin by LC/MS/MS using proteolysis
product peptides and synthetic peptide standards.
Analytical Chemistry
,
75(3):445-51, 2003.
56.
Gerber, S. A., J. Rush, O. Stemman, et al. Absolute quantification of pro-
teins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS.
Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences USA
, 100(12):6940-5, 2003.
57.
Liu, H., R. G. Sadygov and J. R. Yates III. A model for random sampling
and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics.
Analytical Chemistry
, 76(14):4193-201, 2004.
58.
Prudhomme, W., G. Q. Daley, P. Zandstra, et al. Multivariate
proteomic analysis of murine embryonic stem cell self-renewal versus
Search WWH ::
Custom Search