Chemistry Reference
In-Depth Information
[298] Carlson HA. Protein flexibility and drug design: how to hit a moving target. Curr. Opin.
Chem. Biol., 2002, 6: 447-452.
[299] Teodoro ML, Kavraki LE. Conformational flexibility models for the receptor in structure
based drug design. Curr. Pharm. Des., 2003, 9:1635-1648.
[300] Cavasotto CN, Orry AJW, Abagyan RA. The challenge of considering receptor flexibility
in ligand docking and virtual screening. Curr. Comput. Aided Drug Des., 2005, 1: 423-440.
[301] Totrov M. Abagyan R. Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a
practical alternative. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 2008, 18: 178-184.
[302] Muegge, I. Rarey, M. Small molecule docking and scoring. In: Reviews in Computational
Chemistry, Lipkowitz, K.B., Boyed, D.B. Eds. Wiley-VCH: New York, 2001; vol. 17, pp.
1-60.
[303] Halperin I, Ma B, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Principles of docking: An overview of search
algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinform., 2002, 47:
409-443.
[304] Sotriffer CA, Stahl M, Boehm HJ, Klebe G. Docking and Scoring Functions / Virtual
Screening. In: Burger's Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery, 6th ed., D. J. Abraham,
ED.; Wiley: New York, 2003; Vol. 1, pp. 281-333.
[305] Brooijmans N, Kuntz ID. Molecular recognition and docking algorithms. Annu. Rev.
Biophys. Biomol. Struct., 2003, 32: 335-373.
[306] Sousa SF, Fernandes PA, Ramos MJ. Protein-ligand docking: current status and future
challenges. Proteins: Struct., Funct. Bioinf., 2006, 65: 15-26.
[307] Moitessier N, Englebienne P, Lee D, Lawandi J, Corbeil CR. Towards the development of
universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go. Br. J.
Pharmacol. 2008, 153: S7-S26.
[308] Davis IW, Baker D. RosettaLigand docking with full ligand and receptor flexibility. J. Mol.
Biol., 2009, 385: 381-392.
[309] Schnecke V, Kuhn LA. Virtual screening with solvation and ligand-induced
complementarity. Perspect. Drug Discov. Des. 2000, 20: 171-190.
[310] Abagyan R, Trotov M, Kuznetsov D. ICM - A new method for protein modeling and
design: applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native
conformation. J. Comput.Chem., 1994, 15: 488-506.
[311] Totrov M, Abagyan, R. Flexible protein-ligand docking by global energy optimization in
internal coordinates. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Bioinform., 1997, 29: 215-220.
[312] Koshland DEJ. The key-lock theory and the induced fit theory. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
Engl., 1994, 33: 2408-2412.
[313] Creighton TE. Proteins: Structures and Molecular Properties, W. H. Freeman and
Company: New York, 1993. Fischer, E. Einfluss der Configuration auf die Wirkung der
Enzyme.BerDtsch Chem. Ges. 1894, 27: 2985-2993.
[314] Lichtenthaler FW. 100 Years "Schluessel-Schloss-Prinzip": what made Emil Fischer use
this analogy? Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 33: 2364-2374.
[315] Bosshard HR. Molecular recognition by induced fit: how fit is the concept? News Physiol.
Sci., 2001, 16: 171-173.
[316] Freire E. Statistical thermodynamic linkage between conformational and binding equilibria.
Adv. Protein Chem., 1998, 51: 255- 279.
[317] Ma B, Kumar S, Tsai CJ, Nussinov R. Folding funnels and binding mechanisms. Protein
Eng., 1999, 12: 713-720.
