Monitoring and auditing: after the decision - Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment - page 217

Frost, R. 1997. EIA monitoring and audit. In Planning and EIA in practice, J.Weston (ed.), 141-64.
Harlow: Longman.
Glasson, J. 1994. Life after the decision: the importance of monitoring in EIA. Built Environment
20 (4), 309-20.
Glasson et al. 1989-97. Local socio-economic impacts of the Sizewell B PWR Construction Project.
Oxford: Oxford Polytechnic/Oxford Brookes University, Impacts Assessment Unit.
Glasson, J. & D.Heaney 1993. Socio-economic impacts: the poor relations in British environmental
impact statements. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 36 (3), 335-43.
Greene, G., J.W.MacLaren, B.Sadler 1985. Workshop summary. In Audit and evaluation in
environmental assessment and management: Canadian and international experience, 301-21.
Banff: The Banff Centre.
Holling, C.S. (ed.) 1978. Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Chichester: Wiley.
Hui, S.Y.M. & M.W Ho 2002. EIA Follow-up: Internet-based Reporting. In Conference
Proceedings of 22nd Annual Meeting IAIA June 15-21, The Hague. IAIA.
IAIA (International Association for Impact Assessment) 1994. Report of special committee on
guidelines on principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assessment 12 (2).
IEA 1993. Digest of Environmental Statements. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Lee, N. & C.Wood 1980. Methods of environmental impact assessment for use in project appraisal
and physical planning, Occasional Paper no. 7 . University of Manchester, Department of Town
and Country Planning.
Marshall, R. 2001. Mitigation linkage: EIA follow-up through the application of EMPs in
transmission construction projects. In Conference Proceedings of 21st Annual Meeting IAIA, 26
May-1 June, Cartagena, Colombia, IAIA.
Mills, J. 1992. Monitoring the visual impacts of major projects (MSc dissertation in Environmental
Assessment and Management, School of Planning, Oxford Brookes University).
Morrison-Saunders, A. 1996. Auditing the effectiveness of EA with respect to ongoing
environmental management performance. In Conference Proceedings 16th Annual Meeting
IAIA June 17-23 1996, M.Rosario Partidario (ed.), vol 1. IAIA, Lisbon 317-22.
Morrison-Saunders, A., J.Arts, J.Baker, P.Caldwell 2001. Roles and stakes in EIA follow-up.
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 19 (4), 289-96.
Nuclear Electric 1993. Proposed Sizewell C PWR Power Station-environmental statement.
Gloucester: Nuclear Electric.
Nuclear Electric 1994. Suffolk coastal economy with and without Sizewell C. Gloucester: Nuclear
Electric.
Sadler, B. 1988. The evaluation of assessment: post-EIS research and process. In Environmental
Impact Assessment, E.Wathern (ed.). London: Unwin Hyman.
Tomlinson, E. & S.F.Atkinson 1987a. Environmental audits: proposed terminology. Environmental
Monitoring and Assessment 8 , 187-98.
Tomlinson, E. & S.F.Atkinson 1987b. Environmental audits: a literature review. Environmental—
Monitoring and Assessment 8 , 239.
Wood, G. 1999a. Assessing techniques of assessment: post-development auditing of noise
predictive schemes in environmental impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project
Appraisal 17 (3), 217-26.
Wood, G. 1999b. Post-development Auditing of EIA Predictive Techniques: A Spatial Analysis
Approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 42 (5), 671-89.
Wood, G. 2000. Is What You See What You Get? Post-development Auditing of Methods Used for
Predicting the Zone of Visual Influence in EIA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review
20 (5), 537-56.