Participation, presentation and review - Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment - page 192

6. The UK is not alone in this. A 1994 German Federal Administrative Court ruling held that it
was necessary for a plaintiff to demonstrate that a decision would have to be different had an
EIA been carried out, before that decision could be quashed (Weston 1997).
References
Arnstein, S.R. 1971. A ladder of public participation in the USA. Journal of the Royal Town
Planning Institute , April, 216-24.
Atkinson, N. & R.Ainsworth 1992. Environmental assessment and the local authority: facing the
European imperative. Environmental Policy and Practice 2 (2), 111-28.
Audit Commission 2000. Listen Up! Effective Community Consultation
(http://www.auditcommission.gov.uk/publications/pdf/mpeffect.pdf).
Buxton, R. 1992. Scope for legal challenge. In Environmental assessment and audit: a user's
guide, Ambit (ed.), 43-44. Gloucester: Ambit.
Canter, L.W. 1996. Environmental impact assessment, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
CEC (European Commission of Communities) 2001a. Guidance on EIA: EIS review. DG XI.
Brussels: CEC.
CEC 2001b. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council providing for
public participation in respect of drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the
environment and amending Council Directives, 85/337/EEC and 96/61/EC. COM(2000), 839
final, 18 January 2001. Brussels: DE Environment, EC.
CEC 2003. (Impacts Assessment Unit, Oxford Brookes University). Five years Report to the
European Parliament and the Council on the Application and Effectiveness of the EIA
Directive. Website of DG Environment, EC:
http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/eia/home.htm.
Clark, B. 1994. Improving public participation in environmental impact assessment. Built
Environment 20 (4), 294-308.
Dallas, W.G. 1984. Experiences of environmental impact assessment procedures in Ireland. In
Planning and Ecology, R.D.Roberts & T.M.Roberts (eds), 389-95. London: Chapman & Hall.
DETR (Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions) 1999. Quality of Life Counts.
London: HMSO.
DoE (Department of the Environment) 1994. Evaluation of environmental information for planning
projects: a good practice guide. London: HMSO.
DoE 1995. Preparation of environmental statements for planning projects that require
environmental assessment. London: HMSO.
Fuller, K. 1992. Working with assessment. In Environmental assessment and audit: a users guide,
Ambit (ed.), 14-15. Gloucester: Ambit.
Ginger, C. & P.Mohai 1993. The role of data in the EIS process: Evidence from the BLM
wilderness review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 13 , 109-39.
Hancock, T. 1992. Statement as an aid to consent. In Environmental assessment and audit: a user's
guide, Ambit (ed.), 34-35. Gloucester: Ambit.
House of Lords 1981. Environmental assessment of projects, Select Committee on the European
Communities, 11th Report, Session 1980-81, HMSO.
Hydro-Québec 1993. Overview 21: communication and environmental assessment. Quebec: Hydro-
Québec.
IEMA (Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment) 2002. Perspectives: Guidelines
on participation in environmental decision-making. Lincoln: IEMA.
Jones, C.E. & C.Wood 1995. The impact of environmental assessment in public inquiry decisions.
Journal of Planning and Environment Law, October, 890-904.