Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Kenyan, R.C. 1991. Environmental assessment: an overview on behalf of the R.I.C.S.
Journal of
Planning and Environment Law,
419-22.
Lee, N. & R.Colley 1990.
Reviewing the quality of environmental statements,
Occasional Paper No.
24. Manchester: University of Manchester, EIA Centre.
McCormick, J. 1991.
British politics and the environment.
London: Earthscan.
McDonic, G. 1992. The first four years. In
Environmental assessment and audit: a user's guide,
Ambit (ed.), 2-3. Gloucester: Ambit.
McNab, A. 1997. Scoping and public participation. In
Planning and EIA in practice,
J.Weston
(ed.), 60-77. Harlow: Longman.
Mollison, K. 1992. A discussion of public consultation in the EIA process with reference to
Holland and Ireland (written for MSc Diploma course in Environmental Assessment and
Management). Oxford: Oxford Polytechnic.
Morrison-Saunders, A., D.Annandale, J.Cappelluti 2001. Practioner perspectives on what
influences EIA quality.
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
19
(4), 321-25.
ODPM (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister) 2003a.
Environmental impact assessment: guide to
the procedures.
London: HMSO.
ODPM 2003b.
Note on environmental impact assessment for local planning authorities.
London:
HMSO.
Partidario, M.R. 1996.
16th Annual Meeting, International Association for Impact Assessment:
Synthesis of Workshop
Conclusions. Estoril: IAIA.
Petts, J. 1999. Public participation and EIA. In
Handbook of environmental impact assessment,
J.Petts (ed.), vol. 1. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
Petts, J. 2003. Barriers to Deliberative Participation in EIA: Learning from Waste Policies, Plans
and Projects.
Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management
5
(3), 269-94.
Read, R. 1997. Planning authority review. In
Planning and EIA in practice,
J.Weston (ed.).
Harlow: Longman.
Rodriguez-Bachiller, A. with J.Glasson 2003.
Expert Systems and Geographical Information
Systems for Impact Assessment.
London: Taylor and Francis.
Ross, W.A. 2000. Reflections of an environmental assessment panel member.
Impact Assessment
and Project Appraisal
18
(2), 91-98.
Salter, J.R. 1992a. Environmental assessment: the challenge from Brussels.
Journal of Planning
and Environment Law,
January, 14-20.
Salter, J.R. 1992b. Environmental assessment - the need for transparency.
Journal of Planning and
Environment Law,
March, 214-21.
Salter, J.R. 1992c. Environmental assessment—the question of implementation.
Journal of
Planning and Environment Law,
April, 313-18.
Tomlinson, P. 1989. Environmental statements: guidance for review and audit.
The Planner
75(28),
12-15.
Turner, T. 1988. The legal eagles.
Amicus Journal,
Winter, 25-37.
Weiss, E.H. 1989. An unreadable EIS is an environmental hazard.
Environmental Professional
11
,
236-40.
Wende, W. 2002. Evaluation of the effectiveness and quality of environmental impact assessment
in the Federal Republic of Germany.
Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
20
(2), 93-99.
Westman, W.E. 1985.
Ecology, impact assessment and environmental planning.
New York: Wiley.
Weston, J. (ed.) 1997.
Planning and EIA in practice.
Harlow: Longman.
Weston, J., J.Glasson, R.Therivel, E.Weston, R.Frost 1997.
Environmental information and
planning projects,
Working Paper No. 170. Oxford: Oxford Brookes University, School of
Planning.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search