Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
experimental investigation in two different rooms comparing, altogether, seven different
formulae. However, this number includes the three formulae presented above.
Here, we shall present just one example of the formulae particularly developed for
covering the aspect of non-uniformity, a formula given by Arau-Puchades (1988). It
applies strictly to rectangular rooms only and may be considered as a product sum of
Eyring's formula defined for the room surfaces in the three main axis directions,
X
,
Y
and
Z
, each term weighted by the relative area in these directions. It may be expressed as
S
S
S
S
X
Y
Z
⎡
⎤
⎡
⎤
⎡
⎤
⎦
V
V
V
S
S
T
=⋅
q
⋅ ⋅
q
⋅ ⋅
q
,
(4.40)
⎢
⎥
⎢
⎥
⎢
AP
−
S
ln(1
−
α
)
−
S
ln(1
−
α
)
−
S
ln(1
−
α
)
⎣
⎦
⎣
⎦
⎣
X
Y
where
q
is the factor 55.26/
c
0
. Using this formula one
may e.g. assign the area
S
X
to the
ceiling and the floor having average absorption factor
α
X
, the two sets of sidewalls to the
corresponding surface areas and absorption coefficients with indices
Y
and
Z
. It will
appear that this formula will predict quite longer reverberation times than predicted by
the simple Eyring's formula in case of low absorption on the largest surfaces of the
room.
4.5.1.3
The influence of air absorption
In the derivation of the formulae above we assumed that all energy losses were taking
place at the boundaries of the room. This is only partly correct as one in larger rooms
and/or at high frequencies one may have a significant contribution to the absorption
caused by energy dissipation mechanisms in the air itself. This is partly caused by
thermal and viscous phenomena but for sound propagation through air by far the most
important effect is due to
relaxation
phenomena. This is related to exchange of vibration
energy between the sound wave and the oxygen and nitrogen molecules; the molecules
extract energy from the passing wave but release the energy after some delay. This
delayed process leads to hysteretic energy losses, an excess attenuation of the wave
added to other energy losses.
The relaxation process is critically dependent on the presence of water molecules,
which implies that the excess attenuation, also strongly dependent on frequency, is a
function of relative humidity and temperature. Numerical expressions are available (see
ISO 9613-1) to calculate the attenuation coefficient, which include both the “classic”
thermal/viscous part besides the one due to relaxation. The standard gives data that are
given the title atmospheric absorption, as attenuation coefficient α
in decibels per metre.
This is convenient due to the common use of such data in predicting outdoor sound
propagation. For applications in room acoustics, we shall, however, make use of the
power attenuation coefficient
with the symbol
m
, at the same time reserving the symbol
α for the absorption factor. The conversion between these quantities is, as shown earlier,
simple as we find
(
)
⋅
(4.41)
α=
Attenuation dB/m
= ⋅
10 lg(e)
⋅ ≈
m
4.343
.
Examples on data are shown in
Figure 4.8,
where the power attenuation coefficient
m
is
given as a function of relative humidity at 20° Celsius, the frequency being the
parameter.
