Image Processing Reference
In-Depth Information
Locaon Dependent Interacon
(a=0)
0,6
0,5
0,4
Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Scenario 3
Scenario 4
Scenario 5
0,3
0,2
0,1
0
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Users
Fig. 12.7 Location dependent interaction (
ʱ¼
0)
Locaon Dependent Interacon
(a=1)
0,4
0,35
0,3
0,25
Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Scenario 3
Scenario 4
Scenario 5
0,2
0,15
0,1
0,05
0
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Users
Fig. 12.8 Location dependent interaction (
ʱ¼
1)
2, while user 4 connects from both locations 2 and 3. Similarly, the difference in the
location connectivity variation between user 5 and 6 is small, as user 5 connects
only from two locations but with equal probability, while user 6 connects from
4 different locations, but still location 1 is by far the main connectivity location.
User 8 is a user that has zero mobility, user 9 is a user that mainly connects from one
location and user 10 is a user that may connect from many locations with high
probability.
By applying the above data in Eq. (
12.6
), we get the location dependent
interaction graphs (Figs.
12.7
,
12.8
, and
12.9
).
In the Fig.
12.7
, we have applied
0, thus the location connectivity variation
behaviour is filtered out. We can see that location dependent interaction probabil-
ities for User 9 and 10 are clearly higher, due to their interaction probabilities,
ʱ¼
