Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Q1
D2
Q3
F4
Y
Good for
Feature1
Feature2
Feature3
Feature4
Good for
F1
F2
F3
Q4
'
Figure 2.2 From Features (F) to Qualities (Q) through Evaluation: in particular (Feature 1 and Feature
3) are evaluated as good for the task τ while (Feature 4) is good for the task τ
(and she generates positive
expectations of him), also because she ascribes to him certain qualities .
Then, we can say that if (see Figure 2.3):
SetQ is the set of qualities (powers) needed for
X trusts Y - that is, she has a positive evaluation of him for
τ
, then for p ( g X ); in case Y possesses all
the elements in SetQ then X could trust Y for achieving g X .
α
/
τ
SetQ
Feature1
Feature2
Feature3
Feature4
necessary for
IF ...THEN
Y
Trustworthy on
SetQ
Figure 2.3
Given a Set of Abstract Qualities for a task, how to select the right Agent for that task
Search WWH ::




Custom Search